A common mistake when presenting diversifying assets is to frame them as star performers. This sets unrealistic expectations and leads to client impatience. Instead, they should be positioned as a boring, incremental addition that fills a portfolio gap—akin to an insurance policy—to improve client behavior and long-term adherence to the strategy.
The historical negative correlation between stocks and bonds, which underpins the 60/40 portfolio, breaks down when inflation rises above 2%. In this environment, they tend to move together, making bonds an ineffective diversifier and forcing investors to seek new solutions for equity risk.
Despite being marketed as diversifiers, the broad category of liquid alternative products has largely failed. On average, they exhibit a high correlation to equities (around 0.8) while delivering poor returns (2-3% annually), effectively acting as expensive, underperforming equity proxies rather than true diversifiers.
Effective hedge fund replication does not try to mimic individual positions (e.g., who owns NVIDIA). Instead, it focuses on identifying and synthesizing the industry's major thematic trades, such as shifts in geographic equity exposure or broad hedges on inflation. These "big trades" are the primary drivers of performance, not the specific securities.
The traditional asset management industry's product development is structurally flawed. Firms often launch numerous funds and market only the one that performs well, a "spaghetti cannon" approach. Products are designed by what a "car salesman" thinks can be sold, prioritizing upfront commissions over sound investment opportunities.
Contrary to their perception as risky "black boxes," managed futures strategies have low blow-up risk. They trade highly liquid contracts and systematically scale out of losing positions rather than holding on with a "white-knuckle grip." Their historical maximum drawdown is comparable to bonds, not catastrophic equity crashes.