An in-person ballot is anonymous by design. Once a fraudulent vote enters the ballot box, it lacks any identifying information linking it to the voter. It becomes indistinguishable from legitimate votes and is mixed in immediately, making it literally impossible to isolate, trace, or remove after the fact.
People have committed felonies for trivial gains like winning a homecoming queen election or a fishing tournament. This behavior demonstrates that any system offering a significant advantage, such as a national election with trillions of dollars at stake, will inevitably be exploited if vulnerabilities exist, according to basic game theory.
Immigration appears fiscally positive in national statistics because the federal government collects tax revenues from immigrants. However, this is misleading as state and local governments bear the brunt of the direct costs for education, housing, and emergency services, creating a net economic burden on local communities.
The U.S. Census counts every person, not just citizens, to allocate House seats and electoral votes. This creates an incentive for politicians to increase their state's population with non-citizens, as their mere presence increases that state's political power in Washington D.C., regardless of their voting eligibility.
Prior to the 1986 amnesty that granted citizenship to nearly 3 million immigrants, California voted Republican in 9 of 10 presidential elections. Since that policy change, the state has not voted Republican once in almost 40 years, serving as a powerful case study for how immigration policy can permanently shift the electoral map.
The economic impact of immigration depends heavily on skill level. Data shows college-educated, high-skilled immigrants generate lifetime fiscal surpluses. In contrast, low-skilled immigrants often create net drains on the system, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars per person over time due to higher usage of social services.