When the investigation reached the President's inner circle, the government machine mobilized against the anti-corruption bodies. Ukraine's security services arrested several detectives involved in the probe, accusing them of collaborating with Russia. This tactic attempts to reframe a legitimate investigation as a threat to national security.
Officials in Ukraine's state nuclear energy company were recorded planning to skimp on protecting the energy grid from Russian missile strikes. They prioritized pocketing millions in kickbacks over national security, leading to devastating consequences when unprotected locations were later hit.
The massive "Operation Midas" investigation didn't start with the main crime. It began when a politician worked with investigators on a sting against a developer. The developer's seized devices provided the crucial next lead, ultimately exposing a vast money-laundering network connected to the president's inner circle.
The Ukrainian President's office tried to neutralize anti-corruption bodies by passing a bill to place them under a pliant prosecutor, which would have killed the investigation. However, thousands of citizens protested, forcing President Zelenskyy to reverse the decision, an act an investigator credited with saving the entire operation.
Despite one of their key members, a deputy prime minister, being charged by anti-corruption authorities, the criminal syndicate continued its kickback scheme for several more months. This audacity suggests a deeply rooted belief that high-level connections would shield them from any real consequences, even with law enforcement closing in.
Fearing information leaks from Ukraine's Security Service, anti-corruption investigators couldn't use modern wiretaps. Instead, they resorted to old-school methods like physically locating targets and planting bugs. This highlights how state capture can cripple modern investigative tools, forcing reliance on riskier, analog techniques.