There's a growing recognition that the molecular profile of a primary tumor can differ significantly from its metastases. To guide treatment more accurately, the preferred practice is to biopsy an accessible metastatic lesion when possible, as this better reflects the biology of the active disease being treated.

For extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, obtaining a sufficient tissue sample for diagnosis and molecular profiling can be extremely difficult. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing, or liquid biopsy, serves as a crucial alternative in these cases, providing a non-invasive method to secure a diagnosis and identify actionable mutations when a traditional tissue biopsy is not feasible.

Shifting from clinician-ordered to pathologist-initiated reflex testing for NSCLC biomarkers combines diagnosis and molecular analysis into one workflow. This operational change minimizes delays, increases testing rates, and optimizes the use of small biopsy samples, getting actionable results to oncologists faster.

To maximize advantages, an in-house lab consciously selected a different NGS testing platform than major external vendors. This strategic choice not only reduced tissue sample requirements but also offered a faster turnaround time due to the underlying technology, creating a distinct competitive advantage beyond mere proximity.

For certain therapies like Enhertu, eligibility is based on immunohistochemistry (IHC), not NGS. Labs must run HER2 IHC in parallel because NGS, as a population-based test, can miss intratumoral heterogeneity (small clusters of positive cells) that IHC can detect, thus identifying more eligible patients for targeted therapy.

While Next-Gen Sequencing (NGS) provides genetic data, IHC directly measures the protein, is faster, cheaper, and requires less tissue. This makes it more scalable for routine clinical use, especially with small biopsy samples. High-level IHC loss correlates well with genetic loss seen on NGS.

For post-progression biopsies, which are often small and contain necrotic tissue, institutions may prioritize DNA-based NGS panels. This strategy is based on the rationale that most resistance mechanisms are genetic mutations detectable by DNA sequencing, reserving RNA panels primarily for identifying less common fusion events.

When an oncologist anticipates an initial sample (e.g., cytology) will likely have insufficient tissue for NGS testing, they proactively initiate a biopsy of a second site with interventional radiology. This parallel-path approach avoids waiting for the first test to fail, significantly reducing time to diagnosis and treatment.

Despite the risk of missing mutations, oncologists predominantly use convenient, less-invasive liquid biopsies to test for biomarkers at disease progression. A more invasive tissue biopsy is generally reserved for situations where the cancer behaves unexpectedly, such as a sudden shift from bone-only to visceral disease, which might suggest a missed biological driver.