The Fed's latest projections are seemingly contradictory: they cut rates due to labor market risk, yet forecast higher growth and inflation. This reveals a policy shift where they accept future inflation as a necessary byproduct of easing policy now to prevent a worse employment outcome.

The Fed's recent rate cuts, despite strong economic indicators, are seen as a capitulation to political pressure. This suggests the central bank is now functioning as a "political utility" to manage government debt, marking a victory for political influence over its traditional independence.

When national debt grows too large, an economy enters "fiscal dominance." The central bank loses its ability to manage the economy, as raising rates causes hyperinflation to cover debt payments while lowering them creates massive asset bubbles, leaving no good options.

Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.

The Federal Reserve’s recent policy shift is not a full-blown move to an expansionary stance. It's a 'recalibration' away from a restrictive policy focused solely on inflation toward a more neutral one that equally weighs the risks to both inflation and the labor market.

When government spending is massive ("fiscal dominance"), the Federal Reserve's ability to manage the economy via interest rates is neutralized. The government's deficit spending is so large that it dictates economic conditions, rendering rate cuts ineffective at solving structural problems.

Large, ongoing fiscal deficits are now the primary driver of the U.S. economy, a factor many macro analysts are missing. This sustained government spending creates a higher floor for economic activity and asset prices, rendering traditional monetary policy indicators less effective and making the economy behave more like a fiscally dominant state.

With debt-to-GDP at 130%, the implicit policy is to use inflation to devalue the debt burden. This is becoming explicit, with proposals like using tariff money for direct stimulus checks. This strategy favors risk assets and creates a 'full on euphoria tech bubble' if real yields go negative again.

The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'