The administration's key housing initiatives, such as having Fannie/Freddie purchase $200B in MBS and banning institutional buyers of single-family homes, are designed to slightly lower mortgage costs and address political narratives. They are not structural solutions capable of fixing the fundamental undersupply of housing that drives the crisis.
Related Insights
Most proposed affordability initiatives, from price caps to rebates, require congressional approval, which is unlikely. The administration's only significant unilateral power lies in housing policy, as it can direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are currently in government conservatorship. This explains the focus on housing-related executive actions.
The most effective way to lower housing prices is to increase supply. Instead of artificially freezing rents, which discourages investment, policymakers should remove regulations that make building new units difficult. More construction creates more competition, which naturally drives down prices for everyone.
Political actions like Trump's proposed "Landlord Lockout" target a symptom (Wall Street buying homes) but ignore the root cause of the housing crisis: a critical shortage of supply. The real solution requires a massive, coordinated national effort to build millions of new homes quickly.
The proposal of a 50-year mortgage is not a solution but a symptom of a deeply unhealthy economy. It's like giving insulin to a diabetic: it manages the immediate problem (unaffordable payments) without addressing the root cause (a severe lack of housing supply and inflationary pressures).
Banning firms like Blackstone from buying single-family homes is a poor substitute for deregulation that would increase housing supply. However, it's a politically astute populist move that directly addresses voter anger over wealth inequality and housing affordability, making it a pragmatic if imperfect solution.
A $200B government purchase program, which caused a 15-basis-point rally in mortgage spreads, will have a negligible impact on the actual housing market. Forecasts for existing home sales see only a fractional increase, while the home price forecast remains unchanged as any new demand is expected to be met with new listings.
The plan to buy mortgage bonds is not a direct solution for homeowners but a form of money printing (QE). This move likely props up banks holding increasingly unattractive mortgages as housing prices are pushed down, effectively bailing out financial institutions rather than individuals.
Politicians favor demand-side housing policies because it's easier to blame a villain (e.g., corporations) and offer a quick fix (e.g., lower rates). Addressing the root cause—a lack of supply—is a slow, multi-year process that doesn't fit into election cycles.
The core of the affordability crisis plaguing American families is a national shortage of 3-4 million housing units, particularly for middle-income workers and first-time buyers. This is not just a collection of local zoning issues but a macroeconomic problem that directly impacts consumer sentiment and economic well-being.
The most effective solution to the housing crisis is to radically increase supply by removing restrictive zoning and permitting laws. Government interventions like subsidies often create market-distorting bubbles, whereas a free market allows builders to meet demand and naturally stabilize prices.
