Politicians favor demand-side housing policies because it's easier to blame a villain (e.g., corporations) and offer a quick fix (e.g., lower rates). Addressing the root cause—a lack of supply—is a slow, multi-year process that doesn't fit into election cycles.
Related Insights
Both Democrats and Republicans avoid the boring, complex solutions to inflation—like housing density, healthcare reform, and aggressive antitrust. Instead, they opt for politically palatable but ineffective measures like tariffs (Republicans) or short-term subsidies (Democrats), ensuring the core problems remain unsolved.
The most powerful voting bloc—homeowners—is financially incentivized to oppose new housing development that would lower prices. This political reality means politicians cannot address housing affordability without alienating their core voters, leading to policy stagnation and an intractable crisis.
The most effective way to lower housing prices is to increase supply. Instead of artificially freezing rents, which discourages investment, policymakers should remove regulations that make building new units difficult. More construction creates more competition, which naturally drives down prices for everyone.
Political actions like Trump's proposed "Landlord Lockout" target a symptom (Wall Street buying homes) but ignore the root cause of the housing crisis: a critical shortage of supply. The real solution requires a massive, coordinated national effort to build millions of new homes quickly.
Banning firms like Blackstone from buying single-family homes is a poor substitute for deregulation that would increase housing supply. However, it's a politically astute populist move that directly addresses voter anger over wealth inequality and housing affordability, making it a pragmatic if imperfect solution.
A proposed 50-year mortgage, intended to improve housing affordability, is a flawed solution. The extended term means borrowers build equity at a negligible rate, making the financial outcome similar to renting and failing to deliver the key wealth-building benefit of homeownership. It's a demand-side fix for a supply-side problem.
Unlike the USSR's genuine lack of materials, America's problems like the housing crisis stem from political gridlock and local incentives, creating "self-induced shortages." Fixing them requires navigating a complex, multi-layered government system rather than simply producing more goods.
The housing crisis persists because its core issue—a lack of supply—is invisible. Unlike a tangible disaster, people don't see the communities that were never developed. This makes it harder to generate the urgency and political will needed for a solution.
Politicians at all levels actively restrict housing supply through zoning and other policies. This is not incompetence, but a deliberate strategy to protect and inflate property values, which satisfies the large and reliable homeowner voting bloc, ensuring re-election at the expense of renters and future buyers.
The most effective solution to the housing crisis is to radically increase supply by removing restrictive zoning and permitting laws. Government interventions like subsidies often create market-distorting bubbles, whereas a free market allows builders to meet demand and naturally stabilize prices.
