The abandoned Apple Car project, despite being a failure, had a critical strategic benefit: it spurred the development of the Neural Engine. Originally conceived to power a self-driving car's AI, the chip was adapted and integrated into the iPhone, giving Apple a foundational piece of AI hardware it would have otherwise lacked.

Related Insights

Unlike competitors feeling pressure to build proprietary AI foundation models, Apple can simply partner with providers like Google. This reveals Apple's true moat isn't the model itself but its massive hardware distribution network, giving it leverage to integrate best-in-class AI without the high cost of in-house development.

The seemingly unsuccessful thin iPhone Air is likely a strategic R&D initiative to master miniaturizing core components like silicon and PCBs. This effort paves the way for next-generation wearables like AI glasses, making the phone a public "road sign" for future products rather than a standalone sales priority.

Apple crushed competitors by creating its M-series chips, which delivered superior performance through tight integration with its software. Tesla is following this playbook by designing its own AI chips, enabling a cohesive and hyper-efficient system for its cars and robots.

Apple's seemingly slow AI progress is likely a strategic bet that today's powerful cloud-based models will become efficient enough to run locally on devices within 12 months. This would allow them to offer powerful AI with superior privacy, potentially leapfrogging competitors.

Apple is developing an AirTag-sized AI pin to diversify its hardware offerings. This move is not just about a new product but a strategic hedge to ensure Apple remains relevant if user interaction with AI shifts away from the smartphone, mitigating risk to its core iPhone business.

Apple isn't trying to build the next frontier AI model. Instead, their strategy is to become the primary distribution channel by compressing and running competitors' state-of-the-art models directly on devices. This play leverages their hardware ecosystem to offer superior privacy and performance.

While critics say Apple "missed AI," its strategy of partnering with Google for Gemini is a masterstroke. Apple avoids billions in CapEx, sidesteps brand-damaging AI controversies, and maintains control over the lucrative user interface, positioning itself to win the "agent of commerce" war.

Apple's internal AI software, including Siri, has faced significant delays. The strategic partnership to use Google's Gemini model has given Apple the confidence to accelerate its AI hardware roadmap, like the new wearable pin, by decoupling hardware innovation from its slower internal software development.

According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple's 2018 hiring of Google's AI chief was a strategic disaster that left the company far behind in AI. The subsequent multi-billion-dollar deal to integrate Google's Gemini model into Siri is a stark admission of this failure, forcing Apple to rely on a direct competitor for core functionality.

By licensing Google's Gemini for Siri, Apple is strategically avoiding the capital-intensive foundation model war. This allows them to focus resources on their core strength: silicon and on-device AI. The long-term vision is a future where Apple dominates the "edge," interoperating with cloud AIs.