Contrary to expectations, drawdowns in managed futures frequently occur when equity markets are performing well. The strategy's recovery periods, however, often coincide with equity market turbulence, highlighting its counter-cyclical nature and making it behaviorally difficult to hold.

Related Insights

Contrary to popular belief, the market may be getting less efficient. The dominance of indexing, quant funds, and multi-manager pods—all with short time horizons—creates dislocations. This leaves opportunities for long-term investors to buy valuable assets that are neglected because their path to value creation is uncertain.

During periods of intense market euphoria, investors with experience of past downturns are at a disadvantage. Their knowledge of how bubbles burst makes them cautious, causing them to underperform those who have only seen markets rebound, reinforcing a dangerous cycle of overconfidence.

Unlike typical investors who chase performance, sophisticated institutions often rebalance into managed futures when the strategy is in a drawdown. They take profits after strong years (like 2022) and re-allocate capital during weak periods to maintain strategic exposure.

Many LPs focus solely on backing the 'best people.' However, a manager's chosen strategy and market (the 'neighborhood') is a more critical determinant of success. A brilliant manager playing a difficult game may underperform a good manager in a structurally advantaged area.

The most profitable periods for trend following occur when market trends extend far beyond what seems rational or fundamentally justified. The strategy is designed to stay disciplined as prices move to levels few can imagine, long after others have exited.

Simple replication of managed futures indices is slow and has high tracking error. A superior “informed replication” approach combines backward-looking index data with forward-looking trend system priors and active risk management, resulting in a more robust beta-like exposure.

“Crisis Alpha” is not a guaranteed hedge but the result of a managed futures strategy successfully capturing extreme macroeconomic shifts. The strategy is fundamentally about following major macro themes, with a crisis simply being one of the most intense themes it can follow.

Even if an investor had perfect foresight to buy only at market bottoms, they would likely underperform someone who simply invests the same amount every month. The reason is that the 'market timer' holds cash for extended periods while waiting for a dip, missing out on the market's general upward trend, which often makes new bottoms higher than previous entry points.

Combining managed futures with equities in a single product makes the strategy easier for investors to hold behaviorally. However, this “smoother ride” comes at a cost: it dilutes the powerful, anti-correlated impact that a pure-play managed futures strategy can have during a significant market downturn.

Timing is more critical than talent. An investor who beat the market by 5% annually from 1960-1980 made less than an investor who underperformed by 5% from 1980-2000. This illustrates how the macro environment and the starting point of an investment journey can have a far greater impact on absolute returns than individual stock-picking skill.

Managed Futures Strategies Often Underperform During Strong Equity Markets | RiffOn