While headlines tout a massive wealth transfer, a survey of average consumers shows a more modest reality. About half of inheritances are under $100,000, and only 10% exceed half a million, suggesting the largest sums are concentrated among the very wealthy not captured in the data.

The wealth divide is exacerbated by two different types of inflation. While wages are benchmarked against CPI (consumer goods), wealth for asset-holders grows with "asset price inflation" (stocks, real estate), which compounds much faster. Young people paid in cash cannot keep up.

Despite aspirations for upward mobility, the majority of people do not advance to a higher wealth tier over a 10-year period. For those in the middle-to-upper-middle class ($100k-$10M), the figure is even higher, with 72% staying in place. This highlights the difficulty of breaking out of established financial brackets through conventional means.

Massive wealth imposes a hidden 'social debt'—a crushing weight of expectations that dictates how heirs must live, who they can marry, and what values they must hold. As the Vanderbilt family story shows, this can destroy independence and happiness, effectively making heirs prisoners of their fortune.

A growing trend in prenups involves clauses designed to protect second-generation wealth. Parents who plan to leave significant assets or provide ongoing financial support are now insisting their children get prenups to ensure family money doesn't become divisible marital property in a divorce.

Contrary to the image of lottery-winner splurging, a Morgan Stanley survey shows 60% of inheritance recipients prioritize savings, retirement, or investments. Only about a third use it for housing or debt, with day-to-day consumption being a much lower priority.

As homeownership becomes unattainable without generational wealth, social mobility is stalling. The growing gap between asset owners and renters is calcifying, transforming the American economic structure from a meritocracy into a caste-like system where your financial starting point determines your destiny.

To meaningfully reduce wealth inequality, policy should focus on enabling asset accumulation for lower and middle-income families. This includes making homeownership, higher education, childcare, and elder care more affordable and accessible, as these are critical levers for long-term wealth creation.

The massive investment gap in education ($75k/year at elite private schools vs. $15k at average public schools) creates an insurmountable advantage for the wealthy. This financial disparity, which translates to a 370-point SAT gap, is a more powerful determinant of future success than individual character or talent.