We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
An early "yes" is often a strategic ploy. The other party agrees to get your detailed terms and pricing, not because they've committed, but so they can use that information to leverage a better deal from a competitor. A "yes" is merely hope, not a success.
Contrary to popular sales advice, seeking a "no" gives the other party a sense of protection and control. This feeling of safety makes them more willing to honestly explore options and reveal their true needs, whereas a "yes" can feel like a commitment trap.
Proposing several deals that are equally acceptable to you forces the other party to choose based on their own priorities. This reveals what they value most (e.g., price, speed, terms) without you having to ask directly. It shifts the negotiation from a 'yes/no' to a 'which one?' decision.
In any real sales situation, the first number presented is just a starting point. Inspired by Richard Branson, serial entrepreneur Brian Will advises that your first counteroffer should be aggressive. By treating every initial price as something to be rejected, you transform a simple transaction into a genuine negotiation.
When a salesperson quickly gives in on seemingly small terms like payment schedules, they inadvertently tell the buyer that their pricing model is soft and open to negotiation. This encourages the buyer to ask for more concessions, prolonging the deal.
Once a buyer agrees to move forward, the sales conversation must stop. Reps who keep talking—offering other options, re-explaining features, or discussing pricing again—introduce doubt and create opportunities for the buyer to second-guess their decision. Secure the commitment and immediately move to logistics.
Before investing time to create a perfect offer, secure a conditional commitment by asking, 'If I can deliver on these specific things we've discussed, do we have a deal?' This tactic prevents the prospect from backing out to 'think about it' and ensures your efforts are aligned with a committed buyer.
Discussing pricing early doesn't mean you're in the proposal stage. True proposal and negotiation begins only after you have secured explicit agreement on the problem, the solution, and from the key decision-maker. At this point, the deal would close if it were free; price is the only remaining variable.
Prospects often express interest to gather information but lack a commitment to solve the problem. Sellers must differentiate by probing for concrete timelines and stakeholder involvement to avoid chasing deals that won't close, rather than hoping to convert interest into commitment on the call.
A deal's internal priority and executive backing (feet moving forward) are more reliable indicators of closing intent than procurement's negotiation tactics (mouth asking for discounts). Prioritize a buyer's actions over their words.
Even well-intentioned sellers are motivated to close a deal and may present information in the most favorable light. This is often a human behavioral bias, not malicious lying. Acquirers must actively challenge and validate seller statements by testing assumptions and seeking external information.