Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

When driving change, leaders often criticize the past to justify the future. This is a mistake. To secure buy-in, start by honoring the previous state and acknowledging the reasonable decisions that created it. This validates people's past contributions and makes them more open to a new direction.

Related Insights

People rarely have a binary attitude toward change. They are ambivalent, holding both pro and anti-change thoughts. An effective leader listens for an individual's own pro-change language and reflects it back, which makes them 11 times more likely to elaborate on their own reasons to change.

To persuade a mission-driven organization to embrace radical change, leaders must first clearly articulate what will remain constant. By anchoring the transformation to the enduring mission of "original, independent, reported journalism," it gives employees the emotional buy-in to join the journey.

Given that seven out of eight major organizational changes produce no lasting results, employees who are skeptical are not being negative; they are being rational based on experience. Leaders must first acknowledge this earned skepticism to build the trust required for genuine engagement.

Before trying to persuade people, identify the overlap between the necessary changes ('what's required') and what your team already wants to improve ('what's desired'). By starting in this intersection, you tap into latent motivation, creating immediate momentum without having to overcome resistance first.

Instead of pitching a new idea in a vacuum, connect it directly to a leader's existing priorities, such as market disruption or a specific annual goal. This reframes your idea as a way to achieve their vision, increasing the likelihood of approval.

Standard change management models where leaders dictate direction are ineffective because they lack buy-in. Lasting change requires a collaborative ownership model where the team decides on the goal together, fostering genuine commitment.

When introducing change, leaders focus on the positive future state. However, employees are more motivated when they understand the current mistake or danger—the 'why not' of staying the same. This clarifies the immediate need for change.

The goal for a successor is not to replace the previous leader but to build upon their legacy and extend their impact in a new, authentic way. This mindset focuses on continuing momentum and driving future results rather than initiating drastic or corrective changes for the sake of marking a new era.

When new owners raise standards, employees often feel their past work is being judged and criticized. Their resistance isn't to the goal of improvement (the 'what'), but to the implementation method (the 'how') which can feel demeaning. Leaders must frame changes as a shared opportunity to join a "winning team."

The change management industry overemphasizes technical skills like creating models and plans, which only reach those already aligned. The real gap is in conversational skills—the ability to sit with an employee's ambivalence and help them find their own intrinsic reasons to move forward.

To Gain Buy-In for Change, Leaders Must Start by Honoring the Past They're Replacing | RiffOn