As Siri integrates powerful LLMs like Gemini, a simple voice interface is insufficient. A dedicated app is necessary for users to review conversation history and interact asynchronously, much like texting a human assistant, to handle complex, multi-turn interactions.

Related Insights

The review of Gemini highlights a critical lesson: a powerful AI model can be completely undermined by a poor user experience. Despite Gemini 3's speed and intelligence, the app's bugs, poor voice transcription, and disconnection issues create significant friction. In consumer AI, flawless product execution is just as important as the underlying technology.

Despite its hardware prowess, Apple is poorly positioned for the coming era of ambient AI devices. Its historical dominance is built on screen-based interfaces, and its voice assistant, Siri, remains critically underdeveloped, creating a significant disadvantage against voice-first competitors.

Comparing chat interfaces to the MS-DOS command line, Atlassian's Sharif Mansour argues that while chat is a universal entry point for AI, it's the worst interface for specialized tasks. The future lies in verticalized applications with dedicated UIs built on top of conversational AI, just as apps were built on DOS.

Despite Google Gemini's impressive benchmarks, its mobile app is reportedly struggling with basic connectivity issues. This cedes the critical ground of user habit to ChatGPT's reliable mobile experience. In the AI race, a seamless, stable user interface can be a more powerful retention tool than raw model performance.

By integrating Google's Gemini directly into Siri, Apple poses a significant threat to OpenAI. The move isn't primarily to sell more iPhones, but to commoditize the AI layer and siphon off daily queries from the ChatGPT app. This default, native integration could erode OpenAI's mobile user base without Apple needing to build its own model.

The killer feature for AI assistants isn't just answering abstract queries, but deeply integrating with user data. The ability for Gemini to analyze your unread emails to identify patterns and suggest improvements provides immediate, tangible value, showcasing the advantage of AI embedded in existing productivity ecosystems.

In a major strategic move, Apple is white-labeling Google's Gemini model to power the upcoming, revamped Siri. Apple will pay Google for this underlying technology, a tacit admission that its in-house models are not yet competitive. This partnership aims to fix Siri's long-standing performance issues without publicly advertising its reliance on a competitor.

Instead of helping users draft messages, the true evolution of communication is AI agents negotiating tasks like scheduling meetings directly with other agents. This bypasses the need for manual back-and-forth in apps like iMessage.

A conflict is brewing on consumer devices where OS-level AI (e.g., Apple Intelligence) directly competes with application-level AI (e.g., Gemini in Gmail). This forces users into a confusing choice for the same task, like rewriting text. The friction between these layers will necessitate a new paradigm for how AI features are integrated and presented to the end-user.

Despite models being technically multimodal, the user experience often falls short. Gemini's app, for example, requires users to manually switch between text and image modes. This clumsy UI breaks the illusion of a seamless, intelligent agent and reveals a disconnect between powerful backend capabilities and intuitive front-end design.

Apple's Siri Needs a Dedicated App for Asynchronous LLM Conversations | RiffOn