The failure to militarily secure the Strait of Hormuz is a major strategic concession. It demonstrates a critical vulnerability and effectively hands Iran control over a global economic chokepoint, allowing them to wield immense leverage over international trade.

The push for conflict with Iran wasn't just about nuclear threats but a calculated move. By controlling the Strait of Hormuz, the US could cut off China's primary oil source, forcing them into economic concessions and shoring up the US dollar.

The recent conflicts in Iran and Venezuela can be framed as a covert economic war against China. Since China buys 90% of Iran's oil and relies on Venezuela's supply, US actions disrupting these nations directly target China's energy security and serve as a tool of economic containment.

China blunted the U.S. strategy by anticipating the Hormuz closure and cutting its oil imports by 6 million barrels per day when prices spiked above $170. This massive, rapid reduction in demand stabilized global prices and demonstrated China's ability to manage energy shocks, undermining the U.S. show of force.

The predicted US military action in Iran serves a dual purpose. After shutting down oil from the Strait of Hormuz, Trump will leverage China's dependence on that oil. He will offer to reopen the spigot only if China assists in secularizing Iran and removing its uranium, using economic pressure to achieve geopolitical goals.

While oil is the obvious commodity affected by a Hormuz closure, a more fragile chokepoint for the high-tech economy is helium. It is essential for the ultra-cold temperatures needed in advanced chipmaking. With very little supply elasticity, a disruption here could halt the production of chips powering the AI revolution.

Current geopolitical strategies are aimed at securing cheap, abundant energy. This is not for traditional consumption but to fuel the immense power demands of the AI arms race between the US and China. Lowering energy costs is the primary lever to accelerate intelligence creation and gain a competitive edge.

The primary US motivation for the conflict with Iran is not nuclear weapons or ideology, but the need to secure $2 trillion in pledged investments from Gulf states into America's critical AI infrastructure and economy.

U.S. foreign policy actions against Venezuela and Iran are not primarily about democracy but are strategic moves to disrupt the flow of cheap, sanctioned oil to China. By controlling these sources, the U.S. can directly attack a key adversary's economic and military engine.