We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Unlike traditional ML pipelines with predefined steps (DAGs), AI agents operate as dynamic, unrolled graphs. Their workflow is a tree-like structure of LLM and tool calls determined at runtime, requiring systems that can handle real-time graph definition rather than static compilation ahead of time.
Tools like Git were designed for human-paced development. AI agents, which can make thousands of changes in parallel, require a new infrastructure layer—real-time repositories, coordination mechanisms, and shared memory—that traditional systems cannot support.
Unlike tools like Zapier where users manually construct logic, advanced AI agent platforms allow users to simply state their goal in natural language. The agent then autonomously determines the steps, writes necessary code, and executes the task, abstracting away the workflow.
An AI agent uses an LLM with tools, giving it agency to decide its next action. In contrast, a workflow is a predefined, deterministic path where the LLM's actions are forced. Most production AI systems are actually workflows, not true agents.
The LLM itself only creates the opportunity for agentic behavior. The actual business value is unlocked when an agent is given runtime access to high-value data and tools, allowing it to perform actions and complete tasks. Without this runtime context, agents are merely sophisticated Q&A bots querying old data.
The true building block of an AI feature is the "agent"—a combination of the model, system prompts, tool descriptions, and feedback loops. Swapping an LLM is not a simple drop-in replacement; it breaks the agent's behavior and requires re-engineering the entire system around it.
Move beyond single LLMs to autonomous agents like Manus. These "digital employees" can execute complex, multi-step projects by autonomously selecting and weaving together the best models and tools (e.g., Gemini for video analysis, others for PDF generation) for each sub-task.
The 'call and response' nature of large language models (LLMs) is not truly revolutionary for workflows. The significant shift comes from agentic AI, which can connect to various systems and execute multi-step tasks. This moves AI from a content generator to a powerful workflow automation tool.
Simply adding AI "nodes" to a deterministic workflow builder is a limited view of AI's potential. This approach fails to capture the human judgment and edge cases that define complex processes. A better architecture empowers AI agents to run standard operating procedures from end to end.
Unlike traditional workflows that follow a rigid path, agentic workflows can reason, access knowledge, and change course based on new information at any step. This allows them to handle ambiguity and solve for an outcome, not just execute a predefined process.
To avoid the rapid depreciation of hard-coded systems as LLMs improve, Blitzy's architecture is dynamic. Agents are generated just-in-time, with prompts written and tools selected by other agents based on the latest model capabilities and the specific task requirements.