Testing for PI3K/AKT alterations at the initial diagnosis of metastatic disease, rather than waiting for progression, provides a crucial window of time. This allows clinicians to implement proactive dietary and medical strategies to mitigate future side effects like hyperglycemia before the targeted therapy is even started.
Related Insights
True early cancer detection involves finding microscopic tumor DNA in blood samples. This can identify cancer years before it's visible on an MRI, creating an opportunity for a patient's own immune system to potentially eliminate it before it ever becomes a clinical disease.
The modern practice of waiting for detailed diagnostic and genetic information before starting AML therapy provides a crucial, previously unavailable window of time for clinicians to conduct thorough fitness and geriatric assessments on their older patients.
Unlike rare biomarkers that necessitate a 'test-and-wait' approach, IB6 is expressed in over 80-90% of NSCLC tumors. This ubiquity could make pre-screening unnecessary for drugs like Sigvotatug Vedotin, allowing clinicians to initiate targeted therapy much faster and for a broader patient population.
AI identified circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing as a highly sensitive method for detecting cancer recurrence earlier than scans or symptoms. Despite skepticism from oncologists who deemed it unproven, the speaker plans to use it for proactive monitoring—a strategy he would not have known about otherwise.
The InVigor11 study was the first to show that detecting recurrence via a ctDNA test before it's visible on scans is not just a prognostic sign, but an actionable clinical state. Intervening with therapy at this early stage was proven to improve patient outcomes, establishing a new paradigm for cancer surveillance.
The VICTORIA-1 trial found that gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, significantly improves progression-free survival in patients with PIK3CA *wild-type* tumors after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. This is a crucial finding for a patient group lacking clear targeted options and broadens the utility of targeting the PI3K pathway beyond just mutated tumors.
Not all mutations are equal. PIK3CA alterations are often present from the start (truncal mutations), indicating a more aggressive cancer. In contrast, ESR1 mutations are typically acquired later as a direct mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy, making repeat testing after disease progression crucial.
Despite the presence of PIK3CA mutations in some triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors, Phase III trials with AKT inhibitors have been negative. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support using PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors for TNBC in clinical practice.
The panel suggests AKT inhibitor trials in prostate cancer have been disappointing due to suboptimal biomarker selection (e.g., PTEN IHC). A similar drug in breast cancer showed significant survival benefit when using a more precise NGS-based strategy, indicating a potential path forward if the right patient population is identified genetically.
The hyperglycemia from PI3K/AKT inhibitors is due to insulin resistance, not lack of insulin. Treatment must focus on insulin sensitizers (metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors). Using agents that increase insulin secretion is counterproductive as it can reactivate the PI3K cancer pathway.