Real-world data suggests that using one antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) immediately after another is often ineffective. A potential strategy to overcome this resistance is to administer a different class of chemotherapy before starting the second ADC.

Adding obinutuzumab later to acalabrutinib/venetoclax therapy—and only for patients with an incomplete response—achieves the same remission rates as upfront administration. This delayed approach improves overall survival by avoiding early, severe infections, particularly COVID-19, associated with the antibody.

To combat the significant myelosuppression from the standard 28-day venetoclax cycle in AML, many clinicians are adopting a strategy of performing a bone marrow biopsy around day 21 and pausing the drug if blast clearance is achieved to allow for hematologic recovery.

While these drugs can cause neutropenia, it rarely leads to infections. Patients often feel clinically well despite low neutrophil counts. This 'paper problem' can usually be managed with G-CSF without needing to dose-reduce the primary CLL therapy.

Initial studies combining menin inhibitors with venetoclax/azacitidine showed high remission rates but also high mortality. Using each agent at its full, 28-day dose caused severe, fatal myelosuppression, forcing protocol amendments to shorten drug exposure to manage toxicity.

Despite the individual high efficacy of both BCMA-directed therapies and anti-CD38 antibodies, there is significant clinical concern about combining them. The potential for compounded immunosuppression and severe infection risk is a major barrier shaping clinical trial design and favoring sequential use over concurrent combination.

In the AMPLIFY trial, the acalabrutinib-venetoclax (AV) arm showed superior overall survival. This was heavily influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, as regimens containing the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab (AVO and chemo) had significantly more fatal COVID cases, making the antibody a liability during that period.

While the continuous BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib showed longer progression-free survival, this efficacy came with a significant safety trade-off. It led to a 47% rate of serious adverse events compared to 24% for the fixed-duration acalabrutinib-venetoclax combination in the indirect analysis.

The CLL17 study reveals that continuous ibrutinib, fixed-duration venetoclax/obinutuzumab, and fixed-duration venetoclax/ibrutinib all yield identical progression-free survival rates at three years. This finding empowers clinicians to choose a strategy based on patient preference (continuous vs. fixed-duration) without compromising near-term efficacy.