Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

To combat 'crappy first drafts' from AI, teams should double down on fundamental processes like the creative brief. Requiring a human-completed brief ensures strategic thinking, context, and alignment before execution. This 'slow down to speed up' approach uses the brief as a strategic anchor for AI-assisted work.

Related Insights

Instead of using single prompts like "write a blog post," build a custom AI "skill." Codify your entire creative process by breaking the task into sub-steps (e.g., research, synthesis, outlining), with human-in-the-loop approvals to guide the output and inject your unique taste.

To get high-quality, on-brand output from AI, teams must invest more time in the initial strategic phase. This means creating highly precise creative briefs with clear insights and target audience definitions. AI scales execution, but human strategy must guide it to avoid generic, off-brand results.

Optimal AI workflow involves humans acting as the "bread" on either side of the AI's work. A human first sets the frame and defines "good," the AI then executes the core task (drafting, coding), and finally, a human judges the output and decides the next steps. This structure ensures quality and strategic direction.

AI tools rarely produce perfect results initially. The user's critical role is to serve as a creative director, not just an operator. This means iteratively refining prompts, demanding better scripts, and correcting logical flaws in the output to avoid generic, low-quality content.

The effectiveness of AI tools like ChatGPT depends entirely on the quality of the initial inputs. To get exceptional results, "brief" the AI by uploading foundational documents like your company manifesto, jobs-to-be-done, and brand positioning. A lazy or generic prompt yields generic results.

Instead of basic prompting, use an AI agent's "plan mode" to collaboratively outline a complex task, like writing a strategy doc. This lets you align on structure, sources, and verification steps before generation, yielding far superior results. It's like briefing a junior employee.

The most effective way to use AI in creative fields is not as an automaton to generate final products, but as a tireless, hyper-knowledgeable writing partner. The human provides taste and direction, guiding the AI through back-and-forth exchanges to refine ideas and overcome creative blocks.

AI tends to revert to the mean and produce generic ideas. For true breakthroughs, innovation teams must first brainstorm unique concepts without AI to define a novel direction ("front-load the brief"). Only then should they use AI as a powerful co-ideator to expand on those creative sparks.

Contrary to the goal of full automation, the most effective AI workflows intentionally preserve points of friction. These moments—where a human must intervene, check intent, or re-steer the process—are crucial for maintaining control and ensuring the output aligns with strategic goals, preventing the system from running unchecked in the wrong direction.

Top performers don't use AI to produce more mediocre documents. Instead, they use the time saved to go deeper—aggressively interrogating AI output, fixing underlying logic, and having critical strategic conversations they previously skipped. This transforms generated 'slop' into exceptional work.

Robust Creative Briefs Are the Human Counter-Measure to Low-Quality AI Output | RiffOn