A product leader's job is not to synthesize opinions until everyone agrees, which leads to slow progress. Instead, they must create clarity by taking broad input but ensuring a single, accountable owner makes the final decision. Committees optimize for safety, not outcomes.

Related Insights

Relying on consensus to make decisions is an abdication of leadership. The process optimizes for avoiding downsides rather than achieving excellence, leading to mediocre "6 out of 10" outcomes and preventing the outlier successes that leadership can unlock.

Product leaders often feel they must present a perfect, unassailable plan to executives. However, the goal should be to start a discussion. Presenting an idea as an educated guess allows for a collaborative debate where you can gather more information and adjust the strategy based on leadership's feedback.

Product management is inherently chaotic due to constant context switching, ambiguity, and difficult stakeholder conversations. Success isn't about finding a perfect process, but developing the resilience to navigate this mess and guide teams from ambiguity to clarity.

The core job of a Product Manager is not writing specs or talking to press; it's a leadership role. Success means getting a product to market that wins. This requires influencing engineering, marketing, and sales without any formal authority, making it the ultimate training ground for real leadership.

While context switching is a PM's tool, it becomes destructive without focus. A leader's job is to protect their team by setting crystal-clear goals and outcomes. This allows product managers to context-switch *productively* within a defined scope, not be pulled in unrelated directions.

Jack Dorsey reframed the Product Manager role as "Product Editor." The most valuable skill is not generating new feature ideas, but exercising judgment to cut through the noise, simplify complexity, and edit the product down to the essential few things that truly drive customer outcomes.

Ben Horowitz suggests a leader's primary role in decision-making is often to provide clarity, which unblocks the team and allows them to move forward. The organization needs a clear direction more than a perfect answer. This is achieved by staying in the details and being accessible, not by dictating every solution.

When a team seeks direction, a leader's role is to provide a clear, pre-envisioned viewpoint. Deferring with 'what do you think?' signals a lack of vision and causes confusion. True leadership requires having answers to foundational questions before seeking collaborative input on execution.

While execution skills are table stakes, the leap to leadership requires the ability to create clarity amidst conflicting incentives and chaos. Senior PMs are trusted because they can synthesize complex situations, align teams, and simplify decision-making, enabling others to move forward effectively.

Enforce a strict separation between who provides input and who makes the decision. Input should be broad (customers, data, stakeholders), but the decision must be singular and accountable. When the input group is also the decision group, you get a committee that optimizes for safety, not outcomes.