Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Applying economist Carlotta Perez's technology cycle theory, the current AI landscape is still in the early 'invention' stage, not the 'deployment' stage. This suggests today's LLMs are not the final form, and significant innovation is needed before predictable, scalable business models emerge.

Related Insights

Using a Winston Churchill quote, the hosts argue that while foundational AI technology is now scaled, we are far from a mature market. This "end of the beginning" phase means the long-term winners and societal impacts are still unknown. It is a period of transition and disruption, not a settled landscape.

Building an AI-native product requires betting on the trajectory of model improvement, much like developers once bet on Moore's Law. Instead of designing for today's LLM constraints, assume rapid progress and build for the capabilities that will exist tomorrow. This prevents creating an application that is quickly outdated.

Current AI, particularly Large Language Models, represents a "brute-force" approach that will soon be obsolete. An expert from semiconductor R&D hub IMEC predicts a software revolution is coming. In a decade, we will look back at today's LLMs with the same amusement we now have for the slow, noisy days of dial-up internet.

Even if AI progress stopped today, it would take 10-20 years for the economy to fully absorb and implement current capabilities. This growing gap between what's technologically possible and what's adopted in the market creates a massive, long-term opportunity for innovators.

An OpenAI employee warned that the pace of model development is so fast that any process, automation, or product built on a specific AI model today will likely become obsolete quickly. This necessitates a plan for continuous review and innovation to avoid relying on outdated technology.

Despite rapid advances in AI models, the average corporate user has not yet caught up, creating a gap between capability and widespread implementation. This lag means the significant revenue inflection for hyperscalers' massive AI investments is not imminent but is more likely a 2026 event, once enterprise adoption matures.

The slow adoption of AI isn't due to a natural 'diffusion lag' but is evidence that models still lack core competencies for broad economic value. If AI were as capable as skilled humans, it would integrate into businesses almost instantly.

Despite massive investment, the supply-side benefits of AI are not yet widespread. Productivity gains and labor market changes are currently confined to the high-tech sector. Economists predict a broader diffusion of these benefits to the rest of the economy will only begin after the current 3-4 year "build out" phase, likely around 2029 or later.

AI is currently a challenging business because it's in a heavy infrastructure investment cycle, similar to the early days of the web or cloud. Significant value creation typically occurs years after this initial investment phase, and the market isn't there yet.

Comparing AI's current state to the internet in 1997 highlights that while potential is clear, most practical applications are yet to be built. It is premature to declare winners like OpenAI, much like betting on Excite over Yahoo in the early web days.