Relying solely on Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is insufficient for HER2 testing in biliary tract cancers. Data shows NGS misses up to 15% of patients with HER2 overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Performing both tests is essential to avoid denying patients effective targeted therapies.

The CAPItello-281 trial shows the benefit of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib is on a spectrum. Patients with 100% PTEN protein loss by IHC derive a much greater benefit than those with partial loss, suggesting a quantitative biomarker may optimize patient selection.

Because PTEN loss is an early, truncal mutation in prostate cancer, clinicians should perform NGS testing on the first day a patient is seen. This proactive approach ensures that crucial biomarker information is not lost and is available to guide future treatment decisions, such as the use of an AKT inhibitor, should the disease progress.

For certain therapies like Enhertu, eligibility is based on immunohistochemistry (IHC), not NGS. Labs must run HER2 IHC in parallel because NGS, as a population-based test, can miss intratumoral heterogeneity (small clusters of positive cells) that IHC can detect, thus identifying more eligible patients for targeted therapy.

While both are used, some oncologists consider Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) the gold standard over Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MSI testing. NGS provides tumor mutation burden (TMB) data, which can identify rare, ultra-hypermutated but technically microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors that are likely to respond to immunotherapy but would be missed by IHC alone.

While Next-Gen Sequencing (NGS) provides genetic data, IHC directly measures the protein, is faster, cheaper, and requires less tissue. This makes it more scalable for routine clinical use, especially with small biopsy samples. High-level IHC loss correlates well with genetic loss seen on NGS.

Experts believe molecular tests like Decipher and PTEN status are superior to simply counting bone lesions for guiding treatment. While not yet standard practice for all decisions, this represents a significant shift towards using underlying tumor biology to determine therapy, like adding docetaxel.

Unlike androgen receptor mutations which arise under treatment pressure, PTEN loss is an earlier event. Therefore, archival tissue from a primary biopsy is generally sufficient for determining PTEN status, even years later at metastatic relapse, avoiding a new invasive procedure.

The panel suggests AKT inhibitor trials in prostate cancer have been disappointing due to suboptimal biomarker selection (e.g., PTEN IHC). A similar drug in breast cancer showed significant survival benefit when using a more precise NGS-based strategy, indicating a potential path forward if the right patient population is identified genetically.