White House AI czar David Sachs used a Brookings report to claim AI job loss fears are exaggerated. The report's own author publicly clarified that while short-term impact is low, long-term disruption is underestimated, revealing a political motivation to downplay near-term job loss.

Unlike cyclical downturns where jobs eventually return, AI is permanently replacing cognitive roles. The selective targeting of the knowledge economy while manual labor remains stable indicates a structural shift, not a temporary economic dip. These white-collar jobs are not coming back.

Political strategist Bradley Tusk warns that the tech industry is in a bubble regarding public perception of AI. He predicts AI will be a major target in upcoming elections, blamed for both job losses and rising energy prices from data centers. Challengers will use anti-AI sentiment as a powerful tool against incumbents, a reality most in tech are not prepared for.

The narrative blaming AI for job insecurity is misdirected. The true cause is decades of government promising services it can't efficiently deliver, leading to inflation and distorted markets. AI is a convenient, visible target for problems with deeper roots in policy.

Faced with mass job loss from AI, governments are unlikely to seize assets from the wealthy. The politically easier path is to print massive amounts of money for social support, preserving the existing capital structure while devaluing the currency.

AI's impact on labor will likely follow a deceptive curve: an initial boost in productivity as it augments human workers, followed by a crash as it masters their domains and replaces them entirely. This creates a false sense of security, delaying necessary policy responses.

The political hope is that AI-driven productivity will solve the national debt. The overlooked danger is that AI's first casualties will be highly-paid, indebted professionals (bankers, lawyers), whose mass defaults could crash the financial system before any 'age of abundance' arrives.

The robust performance of the AI sector buoys the stock market, creating a positive economic narrative. This economic stability acts as 'cloud cover,' distracting the public and enabling politicians to pursue controversial or anti-democratic actions without immediate economic backlash that would otherwise trigger public outrage.

In a tough economy, companies use AI as a public relations excuse for layoffs or hiring freezes. Claiming that jobs are being replaced by AI sounds more innovative and forward-thinking than simply admitting to financial struggles. This 'AI washing' obscures the true state of the business.