We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Administering immunotherapy while the primary tumor and lymph nodes are intact allows them to act as an "in-situ vaccine." This generates a more diverse and powerful systemic immune response against cancer cells throughout the body compared to treating after surgical removal of these antigenic sources.
Trials like the dostarlimab study in rectal cancer and NICHE in colon cancer show neoadjuvant immunotherapy can induce profound responses in MSI-high tumors. This is creating a new paradigm where major surgery might be avoided entirely for some patients, marking a significant shift in treatment strategy.
The success of neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials like Niagara and those with EV-Pembro means most patients will receive immune therapy before surgery. This fundamentally shifts the clinical landscape, making the question of starting adjuvant immunotherapy less relevant as perioperative treatment becomes the standard.
By treating patients before their tumors are surgically removed, Infinitopes can analyze the resected tissue. This provides direct evidence of CD8 T cell infiltration in response to the vaccine—a powerful, mechanistic proof-point that is impossible for competitors testing in later-stage patients.
The key rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy is that an in-situ tumor provides a rich source of antigens. Treatment primes the immune system against these targets, creating a powerful, systemic immunological memory that can effectively eliminate micrometastatic disease before and after surgery.
Standard cancer surgery often removes lymph nodes—the factories producing immune cells. Administering immunotherapy *before* this destructive process is critical. It arms the immune system while it is still intact and capable of mounting a powerful, targeted response against the tumor.
The traditional CRC treatment path (chemo-surgery-chemo) is being upended. New data shows giving immunotherapy before surgery can be so effective that the surgery itself becomes the "adjuvant" or follow-up treatment, representing a major paradigm shift.
Unlike chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy appears more effective than adjuvant therapy because it leverages the in-situ tumor and its associated lymph nodes as a 'training ground.' This allows the immune system to generate a robust, specific anti-tumor response before the primary tumor and nodal basin are surgically removed.
Clinical trial data suggests immunotherapy's timing is crucial in early-stage TNBC. Given with chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant), it improves outcomes. However, when given alone after surgery (adjuvant), the IMPASSION 030 trial showed no benefit and was halted for futility, indicating pre-surgical tumor priming is essential.
Dr. Radvanyi advocates for a paradigm shift: treating almost all cancers with neoadjuvant immunotherapy immediately after diagnosis. This "kickstarts" an immune response before standard treatments like surgery and chemotherapy, which are known to be immunosuppressive, can weaken the patient's natural defenses against the tumor.
Testing antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and immunotherapy combinations in the neoadjuvant setting is strategically superior because an intact tumor's antigen load enhances T-cell priming and immunotherapy efficacy, an advantage lost in the post-surgery adjuvant setting.