As neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) achieves high pathologic complete response rates in MIBC, a critical question emerges: is adjuvant EVP necessary for everyone? Continuing treatment in patients who are already cancer-free post-surgery may offer no extra benefit while increasing toxicity.

While neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-689) is now standard of care for resectable head and neck cancer, it carries a critical risk. During the pre-surgical treatment window, some patients may experience disease progression or toxicity that makes them ineligible for their planned curative surgery.

In the Keynote 522 trial for early-stage TNBC, adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in only a modest improvement in pathological complete response (pCR). Surprisingly, this small initial gain translated into much more robust and significant long-term improvements in event-free and overall survival.

While neoadjuvant-only immunotherapy has a strong rationale, a patient-level cross-trial comparison of CheckMate 816 (neoadjuvant) and 770T (perioperative) suggests the addition of adjuvant therapy improves event-free survival, favoring a full perioperative approach.

In adjuvant bladder cancer trials, ctDNA status is both prognostic and predictive. Patients with positive ctDNA after surgery are at high risk of relapse but benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conversely, ctDNA-negative patients have a lower risk and derive no benefit, making ctDNA a critical tool to avoid unnecessary, toxic therapy.

Standard cancer surgery often removes lymph nodes—the factories producing immune cells. Administering immunotherapy *before* this destructive process is critical. It arms the immune system while it is still intact and capable of mounting a powerful, targeted response against the tumor.

Data from trials like CheckMate 816 shows that achieving a Pathologic Complete Response (PCR) after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is a powerful early surrogate endpoint. Patients with PCR demonstrate markedly improved overall and event-free survival.

A positive ctDNA result post-surgery in an immunotherapy-naive patient warrants starting treatment. Conversely, if a patient received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and remains ctDNA positive after surgery, it signals resistance, making continuation of the same therapy illogical and creating a clinical paradox.

Unconventionally, Infinitopes' first-in-human trial targets neoadjuvant patients (newly diagnosed, pre-surgery). This provides cleaner efficacy signals compared to trials in heavily pre-treated patients and enables unique analysis of resected tumors to prove the vaccine's mechanism, a key differentiator from competitors.