Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The list of oncogenic drivers where single-agent immunotherapy is ineffective should be expanded beyond EGFR and ALK to include HER2 mutations. Citing a study where the response rate to immunotherapy was zero percent for these patients, experts advise against using it in this specific molecular subtype.

Related Insights

Effective treatment of HER2-driven NSCLC requires more than just identifying mutations. HER2 is a multiplexed biomarker where both genetic mutations (TKD and non-TKD) and protein overexpression (via IHC) are independently actionable. Comprehensive testing is crucial to ensure patients are eligible for the full range of available targeted therapies, including TKIs and ADCs.

The specific type of HER2 mutation significantly impacts TKI efficacy. YVMA exon 20 insertions show the highest response rates. Other TKD (tyrosine kinase domain) mutations perform moderately well, while non-TKD mutations respond poorly. This molecular nuance is critical for predicting treatment success and managing patient expectations.

NGS testing is revealing that acquired HER2 kinase domain mutations, not amplifications, are an emerging resistance mechanism in ER+ lobular breast cancer. This creates a targetable population for HER2 TKIs like neratinib or tucatinib, offering a new line of targeted therapy.

Oncologists distinguish between HER2 amplification (the target for ADCs like TDXD) and activating mutations. A patient whose tumor loses amplification but retains a mutation is considered "HER2 mutated," not "HER2 positive," and is generally not a candidate for ADC therapy.

Contrary to the standard 'TKI-first' approach for driver mutations, a study in MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC suggests a different strategy. Patients with high PD-L1 expression appeared to have better outcomes with first-line chemoimmunotherapy, reserving the targeted therapy for later. This challenges the conventional wisdom of prioritizing the driver mutation over immunotherapy biomarkers in this specific subgroup.

In the increasingly common scenario of gastric cancer with multiple biomarkers (HER2, PD-L1, Claudin), experts recommend a clear hierarchy. Based on data maturity, HER2-targeted therapy is the first choice, followed by PD-L1 immunotherapy, with Claudin-targeted therapy third.

Despite major advances in immunotherapy, patient selection remains crude compared to targeted therapies. PD-L1 is still the primary, yet imperfect, biomarker used. Dr. Carbone highlights an urgent need to develop better predictive biomarkers to customize immunotherapy regimens, as is standard for targeted agents.

The new treatment paradigm for HER2-positive lung cancer will likely involve sequencing a TKI like zongertinib first, followed by an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Early data suggests that the efficacy of TKIs is significantly reduced when used after an ADC, making the TKI-first approach critical for maximizing patient outcomes.

For patients with actionable mutations like EGFR or ALK, targeted therapy is the priority, regardless of PD-L1 score. Starting immunotherapy first in these patients can significantly increase the risk of developing severe pneumonitis (ILD) when they later switch to targeted therapy like osimertinib.

HER2 amplification is a primary resistance mechanism to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. Therefore, oncologists should avoid using drugs like panitumumab or cetuximab in HER2-positive patients, even if they are RAS wild-type, as these patients experience rapid progression on such regimens.