The market's expectation of significant Fed rate cuts is historically unfounded given current economic strength. With nominal GDP tracking so high, any rate cuts would likely fuel further nominal growth (either real growth or inflation), putting upward pressure on long-term interest rates and making duration risk in bonds dangerous.

Recent inflation was primarily driven by fiscal spending, not the bank-lending credit booms of the 1970s. The Fed’s main tool—raising interest rates—is designed to curb bank lending. This creates a mismatch where the Fed is slowing the private sector to counteract a problem created by the public sector.

Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.

In a world where the government is the largest debtor, raising interest rates acts as a fiscal transfer, increasing income for the private sector (bondholders). When this is financed through monetized bill issuance, higher rates can paradoxically become an economic stimulus, not a contractionary force.

'Fiscal dominance' occurs when government spending, not central bank policy, dictates the economy. In this state, the Federal Reserve's actions, like interest rate cuts, become largely ineffective for long-term stability. They can create short-term sentiment shifts but cannot overcome the overwhelming force of massive government deficit spending.

When government spending is massive ("fiscal dominance"), the Federal Reserve's ability to manage the economy via interest rates is neutralized. The government's deficit spending is so large that it dictates economic conditions, rendering rate cuts ineffective at solving structural problems.

Interest rates are driven by nominal GDP (real growth + inflation). A strong economy combined with persistent inflation means nominal GDP is rising, increasing the "fair value" for interest rates. If the Fed doesn't keep pace, it's effectively easing policy.

Large, ongoing fiscal deficits are now the primary driver of the U.S. economy, a factor many macro analysts are missing. This sustained government spending creates a higher floor for economic activity and asset prices, rendering traditional monetary policy indicators less effective and making the economy behave more like a fiscally dominant state.

Contrary to textbook economics, the market controls interest rates. Rising long-term bond yields, driven by strong nominal GDP growth, are forcing the Federal Reserve to follow with higher policy rates, rather than the Fed leading the market.