When major economic data is released, a Fed president's response is not a simple reaction to the headline number. It's a structured process involving a team of research experts who immediately work to "unpack" the details. The real information is often found in the nuances and underlying components, which are then compared to existing models.
Related Insights
San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly uses on-the-ground conversations with local business leaders as a 'disciplining device' for official statistics. When a surprisingly strong jobs report was later revised down, it didn't surprise her because the initial number didn't match the cautionary sentiment she was hearing in her district.
Policymakers are concerned that waiting for clear data on labor market weakness could be too late. They recognize that once layoffs start to "snowball" and feed on each other, the deterioration can accelerate rapidly and non-linearly, making it crucial to be forward-looking rather than reactive to lagging indicators.
While political pressure on the Federal Reserve is notable, the central bank's shift towards rate cuts is grounded in economic data. Decelerating employment and signs of increasing labor market slack provide a solid, data-driven justification for their policy recalibration, independent of political influence.
An increase in public commentary from various Fed presidents should not be interpreted as confusion, but as a feature of the system during periods of high uncertainty. According to President Collins, this diversity of views is most likely to surface at economic turning points, reflecting a healthy internal debate rather than a breakdown in consensus.
Fed Chair Powell highlighted that annual benchmark revisions to labor data could reveal that the U.S. economy is already shedding jobs, contrary to initial reports. This statistical nuance, creating a "curious balance" with a stable unemployment rate, makes the Fed more inclined to cut rates to manage this underlying uncertainty.
The Federal Reserve is not 'flying blind' during government shutdowns that halt official statistics. It uses a composite of alternative indicators for the labor market and inflation, providing enough of a signal to stick to its pre-planned policy path, such as proceeding with scheduled interest rate cuts.
The Federal Reserve can tolerate inflation running above its 2% target as long as long-term inflation expectations remain anchored. This is the critical variable that gives them policy flexibility. The market's belief in the Fed's long-term credibility is what matters most.
Mary Daly compares economic analysis to fly fishing: you can understand the general principles, but success requires deep local knowledge of what 'fly' (or economic factor) is specific to that area. This analogy powerfully illustrates why Fed officials visit diverse regions—to gain the local context that broad national data misses.
The FOMC's recent rate cut marks the end of preemptive, "risk management" cuts designed to insure against potential future risks. Future policy changes will now be strictly reactive, depending on incoming economic data. This is a critical shift in the Fed's reaction function that changes the calculus for predicting future moves.
Jerome Powell's "driving in fog" analogy highlights the Fed's strategy of using uncertainty, such as a government shutdown delaying economic data, to justify slowing down policy changes like rate cuts. This gives them flexibility to guide markets later through speeches without being locked into a specific path.
