Contrary to advocating for a full embargo, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang argues that selling advanced chips to China is strategically advantageous for the US. His thesis is that creating technological dependency on American hardware is a more powerful long-term lever than allowing China to become self-sufficient with domestic champions.
Related Insights
The pro-export argument for selling NVIDIA chips to China is strategic: flooding their market with good-enough, affordable chips makes it uneconomical for their domestic industry to compete. This fosters dependency on the U.S. ecosystem and can slow their independent technological progress.
Instead of a total ban, a more strategic approach is to "slow ball" an adversary like China by providing them with just enough technology. This keeps them dependent on foreign suppliers and disincentivizes the massive state investment required to develop their own superior, independent solutions.
The decision to allow NVIDIA to sell powerful AI chips to China has a counterintuitive goal. The administration believes that by supplying China, it can "take the air out" of the country's own efforts to build a self-sufficient AI chip ecosystem, thereby hindering domestic firms like Huawei.
The US has reversed its strict chip controls on China. Instead of a complete ban, it now allows NVIDIA to sell advanced H200 chips but with a 25% tax, effectively turning a geopolitical restriction into a significant revenue stream for the US Treasury, estimated at $5 billion annually.
The strategy of selling advanced tech to rivals like China to create dependency is flawed. The example of Tesla in China, which arguably gave BYD a 'paid education' in EV manufacturing, shows this approach can backfire. Instead of addiction, it can accelerate a competitor's ability to learn, iterate, and ultimately leapfrog the original innovator.
Seemingly strange deals, like NVIDIA investing in companies that then buy its GPUs, serve a deep strategic purpose. It's not just financial engineering; it's a way to forge co-dependent alliances, secure its central role in the ecosystem, and effectively anoint winners in the AI arms race.
Restricting sales to China is a catastrophic mistake that creates a protected, trillion-dollar market for domestic rivals like Huawei. This funds their R&D and global expansion with monopoly profits. To win the long-term AI race, American tech must be allowed to compete everywhere.
The US government's reversal on Nvidia H200 chip sales to China, now with a 25% tax, indicates a strategic shift. The policy is no longer a complete blockade but aims to keep China one generation of chips behind while generating significant tax revenue for the US.
A complete ban on selling chips to China is counterproductive. The ideal policy allows NVIDIA to sell chips that are one or two generations behind state-of-the-art. This strategy keeps Chinese firms dependent on the NVIDIA ecosystem, funds U.S. R&D with sales revenue, and hinders domestic competitors like Huawei from flourishing.
Jensen Huang powerfully reframes the "China hawk" identity, labeling it a "badge of shame." He argues that while proponents believe they are protecting the US, their rhetoric actively damages the "American Dream" brand, deterring the world's best talent from coming to America and thus undermining its greatest competitive advantage.