The emergence of positive data from trials like PATINA creates a dilemma for oncologists treating patients who are already stable on an older maintenance therapy. The consensus suggests not altering a successful regimen to avoid disrupting patient stability, revealing a cautious approach to integrating new evidence into established care.

In real-world practice, oncologists are granting treatment breaks, or 'holidays,' to metastatic bladder cancer patients who achieve major responses on enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab. This practice, driven by toxicity management and quality of life concerns, is common despite the lack of formal trial data to guide the optimal duration or timing of discontinuation.

In advanced gastroesophageal cancer, a common clinical practice for patients achieving a complete response on immunotherapy is to stop treatment after two years. For those with residual disease confirmed by biopsy, clinicians advocate for extending therapy beyond this point, contingent on payer approval.

A patient on trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXD) for seven years with no evidence of disease and no toxicity chose to continue the drug, declining to switch to a standard maintenance regimen. This illustrates a real-world challenge where patient preference and excellent outcomes can override the clinical logic of treatment de-escalation.

Immunotherapy is now inducing complete responses in a small subset of advanced HCC patients. This success presents a novel challenge, as there is no data to guide decisions on treatment duration, forcing difficult discussions about stopping therapy in patients who may be cured.

To manage infection risk and improve quality of life, experts are quickly reducing bispecific antibody dosing frequency (e.g., to monthly) once a response is achieved. This real-world practice deviates from rigid trial schedules to optimize patient outcomes.

While continuous therapy remains the official standard of care for mHSPC, there's a growing consensus for individualized de-intensification. For patients with a sustained, undetectable PSA (e.g., for two years), clinicians are increasingly comfortable discussing stopping all treatments to improve quality of life and reduce toxicity.

Data shows that patients who permanently stopped ipilimumab due to immune-related side effects still had exceptionally good outcomes. This gives clinicians confidence to manage toxicity by discontinuing the CTLA-4 inhibitor portion of the regimen while continuing nivolumab, without fearing a loss of efficacy.

Despite the appeal of stopping treatment, a key insight from clinical practice is that patients' most critical question remains which therapy offers the longest period of remission, often overriding factors like treatment duration and oral-only options.