The primary constraint on output is no longer a tool's capability but the user's skill in prompting it. This is exemplified by a developer who created a complex real-time strategy (RTS) game from scratch in one week by prompting an AI model, having not written a single line of code himself in two months.
AI coding has advanced so rapidly that tools like Claude Code are now responsible for their own development. This signals a fundamental shift in the software engineering profession, requiring programmers to master a new, higher level of abstraction to remain effective.
A crew of four specialized AI agents—a front-end developer, back-end developer, tester, and project manager—successfully built a robust, sophisticated stock trading platform in just 90 minutes. This demonstrates that multi-agent systems can now autonomously handle complex software development from start to finish.
Unlike previous models that frequently failed, Opus 4.5 allows for a fluid, uninterrupted coding process. The AI can build complex applications from a simple prompt and autonomously fix its own errors, representing a significant leap in capability and reliability for developers.
Instead of asking an AI to directly build something, the more effective approach is to instruct it on *how* to solve the problem: gather references, identify best-in-class libraries, and create a framework before implementation. This means working one level of abstraction higher than the code itself.
Building an AI application is becoming trivial and fast ("under 10 minutes"). The true differentiator and the most difficult part is embedding deep domain knowledge into the prompts. The AI needs to be taught *what* to look for, which requires human expertise in that specific field.
AI acts as a massive force multiplier for software development. By using AI agents for coding and code review, with humans providing high-level direction and final approval, a two-person team can achieve the output of a much larger engineering organization.
AI development has evolved to where models can be directed using human-like language. Instead of complex prompt engineering or fine-tuning, developers can provide instructions, documentation, and context in plain English to guide the AI's behavior, democratizing access to sophisticated outcomes.
Traditionally, building software required deep knowledge of many complex layers and team handoffs. AI agents change this paradigm. A creator can now provide a vague idea and receive a 60-70% complete, working artifact, dramatically shortening the iteration cycle from months to minutes and bypassing initial complexities.
The role of a senior developer is evolving. They now focus on defining outcomes by writing tests that a piece of code must accomplish. The AI then generates the actual implementation, allowing small teams to build complex systems in a fraction of the traditional time.
The new Spiral app, with its complex UI and multiple features, was built almost entirely by one person. This was made possible by leveraging AI coding agents like Droid and Claude, which dramatically accelerates the development process from idea to a beautiful, functional product.