Anthropic's choice to purchase Google's TPUs via Broadcom, rather than directly or by designing its own chips, indicates a new phase in the AI hardware market. It highlights the rise of specialized manufacturers as key suppliers, creating a more complex and diversified hardware ecosystem beyond just Nvidia and the major AI labs.
Related Insights
Despite intense competition, Amazon's core principle of being 'customer obsessed' means AWS would likely provide Google's TPU chips if key customers demand them. This prioritizes customer retention over platform exclusivity in the AI chip wars.
Top AI labs like Anthropic are simultaneously taking massive investments from direct competitors like Microsoft, NVIDIA, Google, and Amazon. This creates a confusing web of reciprocal deals for capital and cloud compute, blurring traditional competitive lines and creating complex interdependencies.
Google successfully trained its top model, Gemini 3 Pro, on its own TPUs, proving a viable alternative to NVIDIA's chips. However, because Google doesn't sell these TPUs, NVIDIA retains its monopoly pricing power over every other company in the market.
NVIDIA's multi-billion dollar deals with AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic are framed not just as financial investments, but as a form of R&D. By securing deep partnerships, NVIDIA gains invaluable proximity to its most advanced customers, allowing it to understand their future technological needs and ensure its hardware roadmap remains perfectly aligned with the industry's cutting edge.
Google training its top model, Gemini 3 Pro, on its own TPUs demonstrates a viable alternative to NVIDIA's chips. However, because Google does not sell its TPUs, NVIDIA remains the only seller for every other company, effectively maintaining monopoly pricing power over the rest of the market.
Even if Google's TPU doesn't win significant market share, its existence as a viable alternative gives large customers like OpenAI critical leverage. The mere threat of switching to TPUs forces NVIDIA to offer more favorable terms, such as discounts or strategic equity investments, effectively capping its pricing power.
Major AI labs aren't just evaluating Google's TPUs for technical merit; they are using the mere threat of adopting a viable alternative to extract significant concessions from Nvidia. This strategic leverage forces Nvidia to offer better pricing, priority access, or other favorable terms to maintain its market dominance.
This theory suggests Google's refusal to sell TPUs is a strategic move to maintain a high market price for AI inference. By allowing NVIDIA's expensive GPUs to set the benchmark, Google can profit from its own lower-cost TPU-based inference services on GCP.
AI company Anthropic's potential multi-billion dollar compute deal with Google over AWS is a major strategic indicator. It suggests AWS's AI infrastructure is falling behind, and losing a cornerstone AI customer like Anthropic could mean its entire AI strategy is 'cooked,' signaling a shift in the cloud platform wars.
While competitors like OpenAI must buy GPUs from NVIDIA, Google trains its frontier AI models (like Gemini) on its own custom Tensor Processing Units (TPUs). This vertical integration gives Google a significant, often overlooked, strategic advantage in cost, efficiency, and long-term innovation in the AI race.
