Politicians will continue running large deficits as long as the bond market tolerates it by keeping interest rates low. The ultimate correcting mechanism for government spending isn't political discipline, but the bond market's impersonal decision to raise rates, forcing fiscal responsibility.

Rising long-term interest rates should not be viewed as a random market crisis to be solved, but as a direct and predictable consequence of unsustainable government spending. It is the market delivering an 'invoice' for fiscal irresponsibility. The solution is not to fight the rate, but to fix the underlying behavior.

Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.

In a world where the government is the largest debtor, raising interest rates acts as a fiscal transfer, increasing income for the private sector (bondholders). When this is financed through monetized bill issuance, higher rates can paradoxically become an economic stimulus, not a contractionary force.

To manage national debt, the government uses "financial repression": keeping interest rates below inflation. This acts as a hidden tax, devaluing savings and hurting the middle class. It's compared to chemotherapy—a painful process that could destroy the economy before it cures the debt problem.

When government spending is massive ("fiscal dominance"), the Federal Reserve's ability to manage the economy via interest rates is neutralized. The government's deficit spending is so large that it dictates economic conditions, rendering rate cuts ineffective at solving structural problems.

The Fed's tool of raising interest rates is designed to slow bank lending. However, when inflation is driven by massive government deficits, this tool backfires. Higher rates increase the government's interest payments, forcing it to cover a larger deficit, which can lead to more money printing—the root cause of the inflation in the first place.

Politicians choose rate cuts because balancing the budget is politically unpopular and would trigger an immediate economic crisis. By lowering rates, they can "kick the can down the road," making massive government debt refinancing manageable. This intentionally fuels an "everything bubble" in assets as a preferable alternative to politically unpalatable fiscal responsibility.

Under "fiscal dominance," the U.S. government's massive debt dictates Federal Reserve policy. The Fed must keep rates low enough for the government to afford interest payments, even if it fuels inflation. Monetary policy is no longer about managing the economy but about preventing a debt-driven collapse, making the Fed reactive, not proactive.