Deal models often flag redundant roles for cost savings. However, an integration leader can identify hidden value, such as crucial client relationships held by an administrative assistant. Cutting roles based purely on numbers can inadvertently destroy the very value the deal was meant to capture.
Related Insights
Consultants and tech firms often define human roles by their most basic function (e.g., a doorman just opens doors). Automating this function saves costs but destroys the immense, unquantified value created through tacit human skills like security, guest recognition, and providing status.
Combining strategy, M&A, and integration under a single leader provides a full lifecycle, enterprise-wide view. This structure breaks down silos and creates a "closed-loop system" where post-deal integration performance and lessons learned directly feed back into future strategy and deal theses, refining success metrics beyond financials.
Earnouts rewarding only the acquired team's siloed performance create a major integration roadblock. This structure incentivizes them to hoard resources and avoid collaboration, directly undermining the goal of creating a unified culture and destroying potential cross-functional value.
Cisco's model brings the integration lead in from the earliest phases to shape diligence strategy. This ensures the "how" of integration is validated early, preventing post-close surprises and accelerating value capture, a stark contrast to the traditional model where integration is a late-stage handover.
To avoid a broken handoff, embed key business and integration experts into the core deal team from the start. These members view diligence through an integration lens, validating synergy assumptions and timelines in real-time. This prevents post-signing surprises and ensures the deal model is operationally achievable, creating a seamless transition from deal-making to execution.
Deals fail post-close when teams confuse systems integration (IT, HR processes) with value creation (hitting business case targets). The integration plan must be explicitly driven by the value creation thesis—like hiring 10 reps to drive cross-sell—not a generic checklist.
To avoid post-close surprises and knowledge loss, marry diligence and integration leads before an LOI is even signed. This ensures real-world operational experience informs diligence from the start. The goal is to have a drafted integration thesis by LOI and a near-complete plan by signing, not after closing.
A true integration leader must deeply understand the acquirer's operations, connect strategic deal value to tactical decisions, and act as a translator between siloed workstreams. This requires intense curiosity and hands-on involvement beyond the scope of traditional project management.
Experienced acquirers mistakenly believe a standard template can apply to all carve-out deals. However, since every company's internal operations are bespoke, a template is at best 80% accurate. The remaining 20% requires deep, deal-specific analysis to avoid unforeseen integration challenges and costs, making over-reliance on a template a significant risk.
A process where the deal team hands off a signed transaction to a separate integration team is flawed. State Street integrates business and integration experts into the deal team from the start. This ensures diligence is informed by integration realities, timelines are realistic, and synergy assumptions in the deal model are achievable.