Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Achieving 99.99% uptime for AI inference is practically impossible on a single cloud. Independent providers leverage a multi-cloud strategy for resilience, a capability that large, single-cloud vendors are structurally disincentivized to build, creating a key differentiator for specialized platforms.

Related Insights

The future is multi-cloud. Instead of creating proprietary lock-in, the winning strategy is to embrace open standards and build tooling that can run anywhere. The "lock-in" comes from making your own managed infrastructure so performant and easy to use that customers choose to stay out of preference, not necessity.

A new category of "NeoCloud" or "AI-native cloud" is rising, focusing specifically on AI training and inference. Unlike general-purpose clouds like AWS, these platforms are GPU-first, catering to massive AI workloads and addressing the GPU scarcity and different workload patterns found in hyperscalers.

Despite using the same open-source models and NVIDIA hardware, specialized infrastructure companies like Fireworks achieve a 5x performance advantage over major cloud providers. This shows running large AI models efficiently is a highly specialized skill, not a commoditized service, creating opportunities for focused startups.

The widely discussed GPU supply crunch is only half the problem. There's a severe shortage of suppliers who can operate data centers with the high reliability and SLAs required for mission-critical inference. Out of many providers, only a handful meet the "gold tier" for operational excellence.

CoreWeave argues that large tech companies aren't just using them to de-risk massive capital outlays. Instead, they are buying a superior, purpose-built product. CoreWeave’s infrastructure is optimized from the ground up for parallelized AI workloads, a fundamental shift from traditional cloud architecture.

The intense computational demand and latency of AI models are compelling enterprises to use multiple cloud providers. Rather than vendor loyalty, companies now prioritize performance, switching between clouds like AWS and Azure to find the fastest available capacity for their AI workloads, reshaping the cloud market.

High-profile outages at market leader AWS highlight the risk of single-vendor dependency. Competitors' sales teams leverage these events to aggressively push for diversification, arguing for better reliability and accelerating the enterprise shift to multi-cloud infrastructure.

Specialized AI clouds (NeoClouds) like CoreWeave emerged because hyperscalers' strengths—such as custom networking and security for multi-tenancy—were detrimental to the performance of large-scale, single-tenant AI workloads. This performance gap created a significant market opening.

The need for high-availability data centers is an assumption from the training and real-time era. For asynchronous background agents, a distributed fleet of small, cheap data centers with 95% uptime is viable. Failures are handled by a robust control plane that reroutes work, trading P99 latency for unbeatable economics.

The high-speed link between AWS and GCP shows companies now prioritize access to the best AI models, regardless of provider. This forces even fierce rivals to partner, as customers build hybrid infrastructures to leverage unique AI capabilities from platforms like Google and OpenAI on Azure.

High-Reliability AI Inference Requires an Inherently Multi-Cloud Infrastructure | RiffOn