Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Contrary to the job replacement narrative, a Ramp study of 21,000 businesses found that high AI adopters grew their headcount by 10% over two years, while low-adopters remained flat. This growth was even stronger for entry-level roles (12%), suggesting AI is a catalyst for expansion and creates demand for new skills, rather than simply cutting costs.
Related Insights
A study of over 21,000 firms by Ramp's Chief Economist found that companies heavily investing in AI increase employment by 10%, including a 12% rise in entry-level roles. This suggests AI adopters are using the technology to go on the offensive and grow, rather than to cut costs and staff.
A Morgan Stanley survey of AI-adopting firms reveals a significant regional divergence. While globally these companies saw a 4% net job reduction over 12 months, US firms experienced a 2% net increase, driven by strong AI-related hiring that more than offset job cuts and attrition.
The primary business use of AI is not to cut costs by replacing workers, but to expand revenue by enabling the creation of more products and services. This productivity boom drives demand for more employees, particularly engineers, to capitalize on new opportunities.
Don't view AI through a cost-cutting lens. If AI makes a single software developer 10x more productive—generating $5M in value instead of $500k—the rational business decision is to hire more developers to scale that value creation, not fewer.
Contrary to the popular job-loss narrative, companies heavily using AI are growing faster and hiring more people to manage increased demand. Studies from Wharton and hiring data from platforms like Indeed show that AI tools create leverage, enabling new businesses and expanding existing ones, thus increasing the overall need for human workers in new or adapted roles.
Contrary to fears of mass job replacement, businesses are primarily leveraging AI as a growth engine. Instead of simply cutting operational costs, firms are using AI-driven productivity gains to take on more clients, increase their scope of work, and capture greater market share, reframing the technology's impact as expansionary.
Contrary to the job-loss narrative, media company 'Every' found that intensive AI automation created more complex challenges and opportunities. This paradox increased the demand for human expertise, leading them to grow from 4 to 30 employees while becoming more AI-native.
Contrary to popular belief, AI adoption drives business growth so rapidly that companies often need to hire more staff to manage the increased demand. A Wharton study found the vast majority of enterprise leaders using AI planned to increase their human workforce, shifting the focus from job replacement to job transformation.
The idea that AI will enable billion-dollar companies with tiny teams is a myth. Increased productivity from AI raises the competitive bar and opens up more opportunities, compelling ambitious companies to hire more people to build more product and win.
Long Lake focuses on using AI to drive top-line growth and enhance customer experience, not to cut costs. By making employees more productive, they can serve more customers, fueling organic growth from 0-5% to over 20% annually. This proves AI can be a positive-sum tool that creates jobs by enabling expansion.
