By licensing Google's Gemini model, Apple avoids the messy and potentially brand-damaging process of training large AI models on vast datasets. This "privacy washing" allows them to deliver competitive AI features while outsourcing the associated privacy risks and controversies to Google, preserving their carefully crafted image.
Related Insights
Unlike competitors feeling pressure to build proprietary AI foundation models, Apple can simply partner with providers like Google. This reveals Apple's true moat isn't the model itself but its massive hardware distribution network, giving it leverage to integrate best-in-class AI without the high cost of in-house development.
Apple is letting rivals like Google spend billions on building AI infrastructure. Apple's plan is to then license the winning large language models for cheap and integrate them into its massive ecosystem of 2.5 billion devices, leveraging its distribution power without the immense capital expenditure.
Apple's historic commitment to user privacy prevented it from using the vast data pools competitors leveraged for AI. This created a technical disadvantage, forcing Apple to use its marketing prowess ('lipstick') to mask a technologically inferior AI product ('the pig').
Apple is avoiding massive capital expenditure on building its own LLMs. By partnering with a leader like Google for the underlying tech (e.g., Gemini for Siri), Apple can focus on its core strength: productizing and integrating technology into a superior user experience, which may be the more profitable long-term play.
In a major strategic move, Apple is white-labeling Google's Gemini model to power the upcoming, revamped Siri. Apple will pay Google for this underlying technology, a tacit admission that its in-house models are not yet competitive. This partnership aims to fix Siri's long-standing performance issues without publicly advertising its reliance on a competitor.
The Apple-Google AI deal isn't a simple API call. Apple is incorporating Gemini models directly, allowing it to adapt them for products like Siri while processing data within its own on-device or "private cloud" infrastructure. This structure is key to upholding its stringent user privacy standards.
Unlike search, where Apple charges Google $20B for access, Apple is reportedly paying to use Google's Gemini AI. This reversal shows that elite AI technology currently holds more leverage than even Apple's massive user base.
While critics say Apple "missed AI," its strategy of partnering with Google for Gemini is a masterstroke. Apple avoids billions in CapEx, sidesteps brand-damaging AI controversies, and maintains control over the lucrative user interface, positioning itself to win the "agent of commerce" war.
According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple's 2018 hiring of Google's AI chief was a strategic disaster that left the company far behind in AI. The subsequent multi-billion-dollar deal to integrate Google's Gemini model into Siri is a stark admission of this failure, forcing Apple to rely on a direct competitor for core functionality.
By licensing Google's Gemini for Siri, Apple is strategically avoiding the capital-intensive foundation model war. This allows them to focus resources on their core strength: silicon and on-device AI. The long-term vision is a future where Apple dominates the "edge," interoperating with cloud AIs.
