For patients with a PIK3CA mutation who relapse on or shortly after adjuvant endocrine therapy, the INAVO120 trial established a new standard of care. Adding inavolisib to palbociclib and fulvestrant significantly improved overall survival by seven months, providing a potent option for this particularly high-risk, endocrine-resistant population.
Related Insights
The VICTORIA-1 trial found that re-introducing palbociclib in a triplet with gedatolisib was effective, even in patients who had just progressed on palbociclib. This suggests that gedatolisib targets and overcomes the primary resistance mechanism to the CDK4/6 inhibitor, re-sensitizing the cancer to it.
Kaplan-Meier curves from the VICTORIA-1 trial show a steep, immediate drop-off for patients on fulvestrant monotherapy, with ~60% progressing quickly. In contrast, the giredestrant combination arms show a much flatter initial curve, visually demonstrating that a primary benefit is protecting the large subset of patients who would otherwise fail therapy very early.
A patient's time to progression on first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy acts as an informal biomarker. A shorter duration, such as 14 months, is viewed by experts as "not so great" and indicates a degree of underlying endocrine resistance that influences subsequent treatment strategies.
Counterintuitively, adding palbociclib to maintenance therapy showed a favorable quality of life in the PATINA trial. Despite known toxicities, the drug delayed the time to first symptom progression. This suggests that the benefit of superior disease control can outweigh the negative impact of treatment side effects on patient-reported outcomes.
The VICTORIA-1 trial found that gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, significantly improves progression-free survival in patients with PIK3CA *wild-type* tumors after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. This is a crucial finding for a patient group lacking clear targeted options and broadens the utility of targeting the PI3K pathway beyond just mutated tumors.
Not all mutations are equal. PIK3CA alterations are often present from the start (truncal mutations), indicating a more aggressive cancer. In contrast, ESR1 mutations are typically acquired later as a direct mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy, making repeat testing after disease progression crucial.
Post-approval studies of the oral SERD elacestrant confirm its clinical benefit in ESR1-mutant breast cancer. However, this real-world evidence also reveals a new insight: patients who have both an ESR1 and a PIK3CA mutation tend to have a shorter time on treatment, suggesting that the PIK3CA mutation may drive resistance to this therapy.
Despite the presence of PIK3CA mutations in some triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors, Phase III trials with AKT inhibitors have been negative. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support using PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors for TNBC in clinical practice.
Three major trials (RIGHT Choice, PADMA, OMBRE) definitively show that starting with a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy is superior to upfront chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, symptomatic metastatic breast cancer. This approach provides better progression-free survival without the toxicity of chemotherapy and, critically, does not result in a slower time to response.
Cellcuity's drug is effective in breast cancer patients without PIK3CA mutations (wild type). This challenges the dominant precision medicine model that requires a specific genetic marker, showing that a pathway's aberrant activity can be a sufficient therapeutic target on its own.
