Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

To prevent founders from dumping tokens, Bittensor is exploring smart contracts that lock owner tokens as a condition of operating a subnet. Control could be tied to who locks the most tokens, codifying long-term conviction and replacing trust with on-chain governance.

Related Insights

Instead of making high-risk bets on individual subnets (the 'startups' of the ecosystem), purchasing the underlying TAO token provides diversified exposure to the entire network. This strategy allows investors to bet on the overall growth of decentralized AI without needing to pick specific winners.

A major subnet's defection, while causing short-term price drops, exposes governance flaws. This forces the Bittensor ecosystem to implement stronger controls like staking requirements, making the network more robust against future bad actors and ultimately maturing the platform.

When building a decentralized network like BitTensor's Hippias subnet, founders must assume participants will exploit any loophole to maximize rewards. This forces the creation of a robust, cheat-proof incentive mechanism to ensure productive outcomes.

Unlike traditional equity, owning a subnet's token grants you a piece of its operational engine — the part that generates the product. The overarching company, with its revenue streams and intellectual property, is owned via separate, illiquid equity, creating a dual investment structure.

While traditional AI startups are funded by venture capital, Bittensor's subnet structure allows anyone to buy tokens and invest in nascent AI projects. This opens up participation in the economic upside of the AI boom to a broader, non-accredited public.

The network's core advantage isn't just distributed compute; it's the economic incentive mechanism. Subnet token emissions subsidize R&D by paying a global, competitive workforce of 'miners' to continuously enhance AI models, creating a powerful innovation engine that's difficult for centralized companies to replicate.

The system is a series of contests within contests, where miners, validators, and subnets constantly compete. This ruthless meritocracy means only the most excellent performers are rewarded, stripping out the inefficiencies and 'hiding spots' for mediocrity common in typical corporate structures.

By requiring governance participants to lock tokens for up to eight years, the system ensures they are invested in the network's sustained success. They cannot simply vote for a harmful proposal and sell their tokens before the consequences manifest.

Some subnets are evolving their economic models. Instead of rewarding many 'miners' for contributing compute power, they are moving to a system where miners compete to submit the best-performing AI model. This focuses the network's value on intellectual property and innovation rather than commoditized hardware.

The Bittensor incident shows how well-designed incentive systems can fail when a leader gains control over a large amount of liquid assets. The temptation of sudden, massive success can override the intended alignment, leading to a 'rug pull' for personal gain.

Bittensor’s Rug Pull Fix Replaces Trust with Token-Locked Smart Contracts | RiffOn