Success brings knowledge, but it also creates a bias against trying unconventional ideas. Early-stage entrepreneurs are "too dumb to know it was dumb," allowing them to take random shots with high upside. Experienced founders often filter these out, potentially missing breakthroughs, fun, and valuable memories.

Early ventures that failed weren't seen as setbacks but as low-cost learning opportunities. This perspective, framed by his grandfather's high-risk business, eliminated fear and built foundational skills with minimal downside, making eventual success more likely.

Corporate creativity follows a bell curve. Early-stage companies and those facing catastrophic failure (the tails) are forced to innovate. Most established companies exist in the middle, where repeating proven playbooks and playing it safe stifles true risk-taking.

The entrepreneurial journey is a paradox. You must be delusional enough to believe you can succeed where others have failed. Simultaneously, you must be humble enough to accept being "punched in the face" by daily mistakes and bad decisions without losing momentum.

Many creators stall not because they fear failure, but because they fear the operational burden that comes with success. The anxiety of not being able to sustain momentum or manage a growing project as a "one-person show" can be more paralyzing than the fear of never starting at all.

Entrepreneurs often view early mistakes as regrettable detours to be avoided. The proper framing is to see them as necessary, unskippable steps in development. Every fumble, pivot, and moment of uncertainty is essential preparation for what's next, transforming regret into an appreciation for the journey itself.

Entrepreneurs are natural risk-takers. Relying solely on logic, which is designed to keep you safe by recalling past failures, stifles the very creative and intuitive superpowers that drive entrepreneurial success.