Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Both the Daniel Penny subway chokehold and the Brian Thompson killing provoked defensive public reactions because citizens across the political spectrum feel abandoned by formal authority. When left and right perceive a systemic void—whether from a lack of public safety or unchecked corporate greed—they increasingly rationalize self-appointed avengers who step into the breakdown of dependable institutions.

Related Insights

Political violence and extreme polarization are symptoms of deeper economic anxieties. When people feel economically insecure, they retreat into tribal identities and become susceptible to narratives of anger, which can escalate into violence.

The number one threat to the United States is not a foreign government or fringe militia, but tens of millions of mainstream Americans who now support political violence. This normalization of violence within the body politic represents a new, more dangerous era.

We have doctors for health crises and faith communities for personal loss. However, most people lack a dedicated 'political home' to process and strategize during prolonged political turmoil. This absence represents a critical missing institution in modern civil society.

Mass support for political violence creates a crucial motivator for volatile individuals: social approval. The expectation that their actions will be celebrated by millions nudges them over the edge to commit violent acts, a dynamic amplified by social media.

Major political realignments are not always triggered by specific crimes but by a pervasive 'vibe' of elite entitlement and impunity. Revelations that expose a culture of being above the law can act as a societal 'let them eat cake moment,' sparking a revolutionary shift in public sentiment and policy priorities.

Violent acts are not random; they often represent the logical conclusion within a person's specific frame of reference. If an ideology convinces someone they are fighting a Hitler-like evil, then assassination becomes a moral duty, not a crime. The danger lies in these justifying belief systems.

Civil unrest and destructive populist outbreaks reflect an underlying collapse in national cohesion, trust, and shared values. When historical narratives focus exclusively on national guilt and institutions abandon social assimilation, citizens lose common ground and devolve from reasoning individuals into destructive hordes. Resolving surface flashpoints like school policy fails to stop unrest without restoring foundational cultural trust.

The appeal of conspiracy theories is not just about specific claims. It's a symptom of a deeper societal problem: the erosion of trust in institutions like government, media, and science. When people lose faith in official narratives, they search for alternative explanations to make sense of the world.

When people perceive that their political participation is futile and that corporations can simply lobby their way past regulation, they are more likely to support violence. A sense of political efficacy is a powerful antidote to radicalization.

Widespread public support for political violence acts like combustible material. It may lie dormant, but it can be ignited into a wildfire of action by a single focal point, such as a contested election result or the certification of a vote.

Perceived Institutional Abandonment Drives Bipartisan Public Support for Vigilante Actions | RiffOn