The 2020-2021 biotech "bubble" pushed very early-stage companies into public markets prematurely. The subsequent correction, though painful, has been a healthy reset. It has forced the sector back toward a more suitable, long-duration private funding model where companies can mature before facing public market pressures.

Investor sentiment has fundamentally changed. During the COVID era, investors funded good ideas. Now, they want to de-risk their investments as much as possible, often requiring solid Phase 1 and even compelling Phase 2 data before committing significant capital.

Unlike the 2020-2022 bubble, the expected wave of biotech IPOs features mid-to-late-stage companies with de-risked assets. The market's recent discipline, forced by a tough funding environment, has created a backlog of high-quality private companies that are better prepared for public markets than their predecessors.

Timing a key data readout is critical for a newly public biotech. A readout in under three months is too soon, as investors will simply wait for the results before buying. Waiting longer than a year risks losing market relevance. The optimal window to maintain momentum is 6-12 months post-IPO.

The reopening of the biotech IPO market is fragile. A key risk identified by investors is a series of failed IPOs, which could halt the sector's positive momentum. Consequently, there is intense pressure on bankers and VCs to exhibit "quality discipline," ensuring that only the most mature and high-potential companies go public first to build a track record of success.

As the IPO window reopens, the initial companies going public are likely those that couldn't get out during choppier markets. Venture investors with "surefire winners" are probably waiting, meaning the highest quality IPO candidates are yet to come, posing a risk for early investors jumping back in.

The closed IPO window forced many private biotech companies to achieve significant clinical milestones, like Phase 2 proof-of-concept, while still private. This has created an unusual cohort of well-seasoned, de-risked companies with attractive valuations, poised to be highly appealing to public investors.

Non-specialist "generalist" investors are re-entering the biotech sector, attracted to a new wave of companies with commercial products and sales data. These are easier to analyze and project than high-risk, preclinical assets. This shift provides crucial capital and signals broader market confidence, as evidenced by their willingness to buy entire follow-on offering deals.

Unlike in tech where an IPO is often a liquidity event for early investors, a biotech IPO is an "entrance." It functions as a financing round to bring in public market capital needed for expensive late-stage trials. The true exit for investors is typically a future acquisition.