The success of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings has rendered the traditional, sequential referral model (dermatologist to surgeon to oncologist) obsolete. Optimal care now demands an integrated, team-based discussion among all specialists *before* the first treatment decision is made to determine the best sequence and timing.

Despite both being keratinocyte-derived skin cancers, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) responds much less robustly to immunotherapy than cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). The pathologic complete response rate to perioperative PD-1 inhibition in BCC is only 23%, less than half the 51% seen in CSCC, highlighting their distinct immunobiology.

With highly effective CLL therapies, primary causes of mortality are now infections and secondary cancers from immunodeficiency. Research is now focusing on immune reconstitution after treatment, marking a pivotal shift towards managing long-term survivorship challenges beyond just controlling the leukemia itself.

The next frontier in CSCC isn't just about new drugs, but about optimizing existing ones. A key research area is determining the minimum number of immunotherapy doses required for an optimal response—potentially just one or two—to limit toxicity, reduce treatment burden, and personalize care for high-risk patients.

Contrary to the common assumption that metastatic disease is the primary cause of cancer-related death, a large international study on CSCC found that two-thirds of patients died from local-regional uncontrolled progression. This highlights the critical importance of effective local control strategies.

Contrary to typical findings where real-world data underperforms, liso-cel CAR T-cell therapy in CLL demonstrates significantly better outcomes in practice than in its approval trial (over 80% response rate vs. under 50%). This suggests that using the therapy earlier in healthier, less-refractory patients unlocks its true potential.

Patients receiving systemic immunotherapy for advanced skin cancer are still at high risk for developing new, low-risk primary skin cancers. Medical oncologists should not act as default dermatologists; ongoing co-management is crucial to identify and treat these new lesions while the patient is on systemic therapy.

Experts advise against using gene expression profiling to escalate care for CSCC (e.g., deciding to add systemic therapy). Its primary utility is in de-escalation: a low-risk profile can provide an additional data point to support a decision for observation in a borderline high-risk case, helping to avoid overtreatment.

CLL-associated immunosuppression dramatically increases the risk and aggressiveness of skin cancers. This risk is not mitigated by novel therapies, and in some cases, the secondary skin malignancy can become a greater threat to a patient's life than their underlying CLL.