A smaller fund size enables investments in seemingly niche but potentially lucrative sectors, such as software for dental labs. A larger fund would have to pass on such a deal, not because the founder is weak, but because the potential exit isn't large enough to satisfy their fund return model.

Resist the common trend of chasing popular deals. Instead, invest years in deeply understanding a specific, narrow sector. This specialized expertise allows you to make smarter investment decisions, add unique value to companies, and potentially secure better deal pricing when opportunities eventually arise.

Traditional VCs are constrained by the need for every investment to potentially return the entire fund. This creates "scope paralysis," preventing them from investing in smaller, niche markets that could be highly profitable but don't fit the unicorn model.

Solo GP Zal Bilimoria intentionally keeps his fund size small and consistent at $50 million. This disciplined strategy is designed so that achieving a 5% stake in a billion-dollar company at exit would generate a $50 million return, covering the entire fund and ensuring strong performance from a single breakout investment.

VC outcomes aren't a bell curve; a tiny fraction of investments deliver exponential returns covering all losses. This 'power law' dynamic means VCs must hunt for massive outliers, not just 'good' companies. Thiel only invests in startups with the potential to return his whole fund.

Traditionally, venture investors sought high multiples (e.g., 100x) exclusively at the early stage. However, the sheer scale of modern tech outcomes has changed this. The opportunity for high-multiple returns now extends into later stages, allowing growth funds to pursue the same outlier returns previously confined to seed investing.

Unlike venture capital, which relies on a few famous home runs, private equity success is built on a different model. It involves consistently executing "blocking and tackling" to achieve 3-4x returns on obscure industrial or service businesses that the public has never heard of.

Bill Maris argues that smaller funds (<$750M) consistently outperform larger ones due to simple math. A multi-billion-dollar fund needs to return a value that can exceed the entire annual VC-backed exit market to achieve a 3x return. Smaller funds have more achievable targets and can offer founders more focused support.

David George of Andreessen Horowitz reveals that contrary to the belief that smaller funds yield higher multiples, a16z's best-performing fund is a $1B vehicle. This success is driven by capturing enough ownership in massive winners like Databricks and Coinbase, demonstrating that fund size can be an advantage in today's market where value creation extends into later private stages.