We incorrectly equate authenticity with low-production values or avoiding technology. True authenticity comes from the creator's intent and vision. An AI-generated film can be as authentic as a raw vlog if it genuinely reflects the creator's purpose. The tools, from a canvas to AI, are irrelevant.

Related Insights

AI video tools like Sora optimize for high production value, but popular internet content often succeeds due to its message and authenticity, not its polish. The assumption that better visuals create better engagement is a risky product bet, as it iterates on an axis that users may not value.

In the age of AI, the new standard for value is the "GPT Test." If a person's public statements, writing, or ideas could have been generated by a large language model, they will fail to stand out. This places an immense premium on true originality, deep insight, and an authentic voice—the very things AI struggles to replicate.

Using AI to save time on content can backfire if the audience expects authenticity. The value in human-created art, writing, or presentations often lies in the invested energy and personal story, which AI shortcuts can devalue in the customer's eyes.

Audiences crave authenticity, making highly polished videos feel unrelatable. Instead of investing in expensive gear, creators should invest in authentic storytelling, embracing a raw and imperfect style that builds more trust.

As AI democratizes the technical aspects of content creation, the ability to guide it with unique perspective, craft, and taste becomes the key differentiator. AI is a powerful tool for experts to scale their vision, but it cannot replace the vision itself.

The definition of "AI slop" is evolving from obviously fake images to a flood of perfectly polished, generic, and boring content. As AI makes flattering imagery cheap to produce, authentic, unpolished, and even unflattering content becomes more valuable for creators trying to stand out on platforms like Instagram.

Studies show people often prefer AI-generated art based on quality alone, but their preference flips to the human-created version once they know the source. This reveals a deep-seated bias for human effort, posing a significant "Catch-22" for marketers who risk losing audience appreciation if their AI usage is discovered.

While AI video tools can generate visually interesting ads cheaply and capture views, they currently lack the authentic creative spark needed for true brand building. Their value lies in quick, low-cost content, making them a performance marketing tool rather than an asset for creating a lasting, memorable brand identity.

The "authenticity" that makes video performers successful is a constructed performance of understanding an unseen audience while staring into a camera. It's a specific, under-theorized skill of transmission, not a reflection of one's true self, making the term "authentic" a misnomer for a calculated craft.

As AI-driven content becomes perfectly polished and ubiquitous, audiences increasingly crave genuine, unscripted human connection. Prioritizing vulnerability and realness over perfection builds a more loyal community that feels personal and trustworthy.