A company with 78% engagement scores was hemorrhaging high-potential talent. Exit interviews revealed the cause: employees were engaged in their work but were exhausted from trying to "fit in." This shows that engagement and belonging are not the same and must be measured independently.
Related Insights
The pressure to conform to a dominant culture ("culture fit") depletes employees' energy. This emotional labor, a "conformity tax," becomes too costly for high-performers, causing them to leave despite high engagement scores, because the cost of fitting in becomes too high.
DEI metrics track inputs like representation and training completion ("who is in the room"). In contrast, belonging metrics measure the output: whether every employee can perform at their best. This provides a direct link to productivity, innovation, and retention that input metrics miss.
When employees dislike their manager, they often engage in 'quiet quitting' by deliberately working at a fraction of their capacity—just enough to avoid being fired. This makes genuine employee engagement a direct indicator of leadership quality.
Average belonging scores are misleading. A company with a 72% mean score found belonging dropped 34% for specific groups when data was disaggregated by intersectional factors like role, race, and tenure. This gap analysis pinpoints exactly where culture is failing and predicts future turnover.
Despite a billion-dollar engagement industry, engagement is at a 10-year low. The root cause is not a lack of perks but a fundamental feeling of insignificance, as few employees feel genuinely cared for or invested in by their workplace.
Most HR metrics are lagging indicators like turnover or financial results. Research identifies employee connection as the key *leading* indicator that creates a causal chain: strong connection drives higher engagement, which improves retention, and that stability ultimately leads to greater profitability.
Standard engagement surveys fail because employees fear answering direct questions about job satisfaction or retention honestly. A more effective approach is to use a proxy question like, "How seen and heard do you feel by your immediate supervisor?" which provides a safer space for truthful responses.
Belonging is not solely the company's burden or the employee's task. The "50-50 framework" posits that the organization must provide clarity and support, and the individual must reciprocate with effort and engagement. This mutual exchange creates a sustainable, high-performance environment.
Even with good pay, employees feel stuck when their primal needs to belong and matter are unmet. The brain interprets this as a survival threat, triggering a stress response, cognitive dissonance, and disengagement.
When employees feel excluded, the consequence isn't just passive disengagement. It can breed resentment that leads them to withhold crucial ideas, watch things fail without intervening, or even actively work against the organization's interests. Exclusion creates a tangible cost and risk.
