Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

According to Zapier's CEO, the optimal approach is a hybrid one. AI agents excel at interpreting natural language to construct complex workflows. However, the execution of these workflows should rely on deterministic, predictable code for reliability and lower cost, since 80% of agent tasks don't need AI's judgment.

Related Insights

For core business automations, agentic AIs that "guess" are expensive and unreliable. A superior approach uses tools that convert natural language into deterministic, code-like workflows, which run consistently and use AI only when necessary.

Contrary to the vision of free-wheeling autonomous agents, most business automation relies on strict Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Products like OpenAI's Agent Builder succeed by providing deterministic, node-based workflows that enforce business logic, which is more valuable than pure autonomy.

Fully autonomous agents are not yet reliable for complex production use cases because accuracy collapses when chaining multiple probabilistic steps. Zapier's CEO recommends a hybrid "agentic workflow" approach: embed a single, decisive agent within an otherwise deterministic, structured workflow to ensure reliability while still leveraging LLM intelligence.

Wade Foster argues that for most business automation, delegating tasks to an AI agent is inefficient. Instead, an AI should be used to *build* a deterministic workflow (i.e., traditional code) which is cheaper and more reliable for execution. AI's reasoning is best reserved only for parts that truly require it.

Counter the hype by following a clear progression: Skills -> Workflows -> Agents. If you cannot create a reliable, deterministic workflow with a predefined path, an autonomous agent attempting to improvise will almost certainly fail. This structured approach mitigates risk and ensures reliability.

For robust personal automation, pure agentic loops are inefficient and unreliable. Zapier's CEO structures his agents to use deterministic code for predictable tasks like fetching calendar events, which is cheaper and more reliable. AI reasoning is reserved only for specific steps like summarization, creating a powerful hybrid.

Separate AI's role. Use an AI assistant to write reliable, deterministic code for structuring data (e.g., pulling Slack messages via API). Then, apply a live AI model only for the subjective task, like categorizing message urgency. This hybrid approach creates a more robust and controllable system.

While autonomous AI agents generate significant hype, their real-world business value is currently limited and unreliable. Marketers should instead focus on building deterministic AI automations—workflows with a clear, predefined sequence of steps—which deliver consistent and valuable results for specific marketing tasks today.

The most powerful automations are not complex agents but simple, predictable workflows that save time reliably. The goal is determinism; AI introduces a "black box" of uncertainty. Therefore, the highest ROI comes from extremely linear processes where "boring is beautiful" and predictability is guaranteed.

The issue of AI agents "going rogue" is often a human-created problem. According to Zapier's CEO, it's caused by applying probabilistic AI to tasks that should be handled by predictable, deterministic code. This overuse is driven by incentives to "token max" and the novelty of AI, leading to unpredictable outcomes.

Zapier CEO: Use AI to Build Automations, Use Deterministic Workflows to Run Them | RiffOn