Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Contrary to fears that AI creates low-quality "slop," Intercom found their code quality improved. AI compresses the cost of fixing tech debt, flaky tests, and other internal projects, making it easier for the business to invest in them.

Related Insights

The rapid pace of development enabled by AI doesn't eliminate technical debt; it accelerates its creation. More code shipped faster means more potential bugs, maintenance overhead, and architectural risk that must be managed proactively, not just reactively.

Ramp's code generation by AI has rapidly increased from 30% to 50% in three months. This isn't just for prototypes but for the entire production stack, back-end and front-end, signaling a fundamental shift in software development that makes the entire company more productive.

Intercom's CTO set a goal to 2x R&D throughput, using pull requests as a simple, albeit crude, metric. In a high-trust environment, this focused the team on adopting AI tools to increase output, leading to measurable success.

Facing an AI bill that looks like their velocity chart, Intercom deliberately absorbs the cost. They encourage universal use of the most powerful models, viewing the immediate gains in speed and innovation as an investment that outweighs near-term cost concerns.

Prototyping directly in the production environment makes high-quality interactions achievable without extensive resources. This dissolves the traditional design dilemma of sacrificing quality for speed, allowing teams to build better products faster.

While AI-powered code generation gets the attention, the most significant productivity gain for engineering teams is achieving 100% automated test coverage. This is the true unlock, as it eliminates the primary bottleneck to shipping high-quality code faster, reducing bug-fixing cycles and customer support loads.

While AI coding assistants appear to boost output, they introduce a "rework tax." A Stanford study found AI-generated code leads to significant downstream refactoring. A team might ship 40% more code, but if half of that increase is just fixing last week's AI-generated "slop," the real productivity gain is much lower than headlines suggest.

AI coding assistants have recently crossed a critical threshold. They are no longer just for building new features but are now highly effective at refactoring legacy code. This dramatically changes the economics of modernizing established software companies by accelerating the notoriously slow process of paying down technical debt.

For teams that have already mastered shipping speed, AI's efficiency boost isn't just for increasing output. Instead, those gains are strategically reinvested into achieving a much higher level of product quality and design refinement before launch, moving beyond the 'ship and fix' cycle.

An Intercom AI skill for fixing flaky tests goes beyond a simple script. It updates its own internal checklist when it encounters a new type of fix and then proactively searches the codebase for similar problems, creating a 100x impact.