As AI assistants learn an individual's preferences, style, and context, their utility becomes deeply personalized. This creates a powerful lock-in effect, making users reluctant to switch to competing platforms, even if those platforms are technically superior.

Traditional SaaS switching costs were based on painful data migrations, which LLMs may now automate. The new moat for AI companies is creating deep, customized integrations into a customer's unique operational workflows. This is achieved through long, hands-on pilot periods that make the AI solution indispensable and hard to replace.

While AI can easily replicate simple SaaS features (e.g., a server alert), it poses little threat to deeply embedded enterprise systems. The complexity, integrations, and "dark matter" of these platforms create a "hostage" dynamic where ripping them out is impractical, regardless of cloning capabilities.

The assumption that enterprise API spending on AI models creates a strong moat is flawed. In reality, businesses can and will easily switch between providers like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. This makes the market a commodity battleground where cost and on-par performance, not loyalty, will determine the winners.

Unlike traditional APIs, LLMs are hard to abstract away. Users develop a preference for a specific model's 'personality' and performance (e.g., GPT-4 vs. 3.5), making it difficult for applications to swap out the underlying model without user notice and pushback.

An enterprise CIO confirms that once a company invests time training a generative AI solution, the cost to switch vendors becomes prohibitive. This means early-stage AI startups can build a powerful moat simply by being the first vendor to get implemented and trained.

AI coding agents will make migrating between complex enterprise systems like SAP and Oracle dramatically easier and cheaper. This erodes the moat of high switching costs, forcing incumbents to compete on product value rather than customer lock-in, where they once held customers as "hostages."

CIOs report that the unbudgeted 'soft costs' of implementing AI—training, onboarding, and business process change—are the highest they've ever seen. This extreme cost and effort will make companies highly reluctant to switch AI vendors, creating strong defensibility and lock-in for the platforms chosen during this initial wave.

Despite constant new model releases, enterprises don't frequently switch LLMs. Prompts and workflows become highly optimized for a specific model's behavior, creating significant switching costs. Performance gains of a new model must be substantial to justify this re-engineering effort.