Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Startups rarely proactively buy security solutions. However, they are forced to buy compliance (like SOC 2) when a customer demands it. This creates a powerful, time-sensitive purchasing moment that security companies can leverage for go-to-market.

Related Insights

In markets like higher education accessibility management, the primary buyer (e.g., a risk officer) prioritizes compliance and functionality over a polished UI. While good UX is valued, the crucial differentiator is whether the software fulfills legal requirements. The focus is on simplicity, clarity, and customizable features that solve specific compliance needs.

Vanta effectively segments the market by product experience. Startups, unfamiliar with compliance, need a guided, prescriptive "TurboTax-like" process. In contrast, mature enterprises want a monitoring platform—"DataDog for compliance controls"—to manage their existing, complex programs.

Founders often over-prioritize non-revenue tasks like getting compliance certifications. Unless you are actively losing deals because you lack SOC 2 or ISO, you should delay it. View compliance as a task to be completed only when it becomes a direct blocker to sales, not as a box to check early on.

The most reliable markets are those where customers are legally obligated to buy. By offering services that help companies comply with regulations like the EU AI Act, you tap into a non-discretionary budget. The sales conversation shifts from "if" they will buy to "who" they will buy from.

Compliance frameworks such as SOC 2 and HIPAA are designed to spread virally. Once a company becomes compliant, it contractually requires its vendors to do the same. This creates a cascading chain reaction that rapidly expands the standard's adoption across an entire ecosystem, far beyond its initial targets.

MSPs often avoid selling compliance services due to their complexity and perceived liability. However, 'human risk' is a required part of most frameworks and is far more tangible and easier to sell than technical controls. It acts as a wedge, allowing MSPs to enter the lucrative compliance market with a simpler, more relatable offering.

Inexperienced founders often misinterpret a SOC 2 requirement as a minor administrative hurdle, like paying for a registered agent. This fundamental misunderstanding that compliance is just a low-effort "tick box" creates the demand for vendors who promise a cheap, fast, and ultimately fraudulent, solution.

Before launching, the Drata team committed to being their own first customer. They used their product to achieve SOC 2 compliance, ensuring it worked and embodying their core value of proving, not just telling.

As vendors embed SOC and MDR services—often at the request of large customers—they risk eroding the core value of their MSP partners. This trend could push MSPs to migrate towards vendors that don't offer competing services, just to preserve their own service revenue and expertise.

For Outbound Sync founder Harris Kenney, SOC 2 was more than a sales checkbox. As a non-technical founder, the process imposed engineering discipline and best practices his team might have otherwise skipped, improving the product and covering his own knowledge gaps.

Startups Buy Urgent Compliance, Not Abstract Security | RiffOn