Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

For long-running tasks, OpenClaw can spawn a "sub-agent" to work in the background. This architecture prevents the main agent from being tied up, allowing the user to continue interacting with it without delay. It's a key pattern for building a better user experience with agentic AI.

Related Insights

Unlike standard chatbots where you wait for a response before proceeding, Cowork allows users to assign long-running tasks and queue new requests while the AI is working. This shifts the interaction from a turn-by-turn conversation to a delegated task model.

True Agentic AI isn't a single, all-powerful bot. It's an orchestrated system of multiple, specialized agents, each performing a single task (e.g., qualifying, booking, analyzing). This 'division of labor,' mirroring software engineering principles, creates a more robust, scalable, and manageable automation pipeline.

Structure your AI automations architecturally. Create specialized sub-agents, each with a discrete 'skill' (e.g., scraping Twitter). Your main OpenClaw agent then acts as an orchestrator, calling these skilled sub-agents as needed. This frees up the main agent and creates a modular, powerful system.

Structure your development workflow to leverage the AI agent as a parallel processor. While you focus on a hands-on coding task in the main editor window, delegate a separate, non-blocking task (like scaffolding a new route) to the agent in a side panel, allowing it to "cook in the background."

The "magic" feeling of OpenClaw agents stems from clever engineering, not sentience. Systems like a "heartbeat" (a regular timer prompting action), scheduled jobs (crons), and queued messaging allow agents to perform background tasks and initiate actions proactively. This creates the illusion of an inner life, but is fundamentally a loop processing events.

A new software paradigm, "agent-native architecture," treats AI as a core component, not an add-on. This progresses in levels: the agent can do any UI action, trigger any backend code, and finally, perform any developer task like writing and deploying new code, enabling user-driven app customization.

Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.

Long-horizon agents, which can run for hours or days, require a dual-mode UI. Users need an asynchronous way to manage multiple running agents (like a Jira board or inbox). However, they also need to seamlessly switch to a synchronous chat interface to provide real-time feedback or corrections when an agent pauses or finishes.

Waiting for a single AI assistant to process requests creates constant start-stop interruptions. Using a tool like Conductor to run multiple AI coding agents in parallel on different tasks eliminates this downtime, helping developers and designers maintain a state of deep focus and productivity.

Go beyond using a single OpenClaw instance. Spawn multiple sub-agents to parallelize work. This can mean either having ten agents work on ten different parts of one large task, or having ten agents run ten separate instances of the same task simultaneously.